Division of Trauma, Critical Care, Emergency Surgery, and Burns, Department of Surgery, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona.
Arizona Center on Aging, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona.
J Surg Res. 2019 Jan;233:397-402. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.08.033. Epub 2018 Sep 17.
Failure to rescue (FTR) is considered as an index of quality of care provided by a hospital. However, the role of frailty in FTR remains unclear. We hypothesized that the FTR rate is higher for frail geriatric emergency general surgery (EGS) patients than nonfrail geriatric EGS patients.
We performed a 3-y (2015-2017) prospective cohort study of all geriatric patients (age ≥ 65 y) requiring EGS. Frailty was calculated by using the EGS-specific Frailty Index (EGSFI) within 24 h of admission. Patients were divided into two groups: frail (FI ≥ 0.325) and nonfrail (FI < 0.325). We defined FTR as death from a major complication. Regression analysis was performed to control for demographics, type of operative intervention, admission vitals, and admission laboratory values.
Three hundred twenty-six geriatric EGS patients were included, of which 38.9% were frail. Frail patients were more likely to be white (P < 0.01) and, on admission, had a higher American Association of Anesthesiologist class (P = 0.03) and lower serum albumin (P < 0.01). However, there was no difference between the groups regarding age (P = 0.54), gender (P = 0.56), admission vitals, and WBC count (P = 0.35). Overall, 26.7% (n = 85) of patients developed in-hospital complications; and mortality occurred in 30% (n = 26) of those patients (i.e., the FTR group). Frail patients had higher rates of FTR (14% vs. 4%, P < 0.001) than nonfrail patients. On regression analysis, after controlling for confounders, frail status was an independent predictor of FTR (OR: 3.4 [2.3-4.6]) in geriatric EGS patients.
Our study demonstrates that in geriatric EGS patients, a frail status independently contributes to FTR and increases the odds of FTR threefold compared with nonfrail status. Thus, it should be included in quality metrics for geriatric EGS patients.
医院提供的护理质量的一个指标是未能抢救(FTR)。然而,虚弱在 FTR 中的作用仍不清楚。我们假设,虚弱的老年急诊普通外科(EGS)患者的 FTR 发生率高于非虚弱的老年 EGS 患者。
我们对所有需要 EGS 的老年患者(年龄≥65 岁)进行了一项为期 3 年(2015-2017 年)的前瞻性队列研究。入院后 24 小时内通过 EGS 特异性虚弱指数(EGSFI)计算虚弱程度。患者分为两组:虚弱(FI≥0.325)和非虚弱(FI<0.325)。我们将 FTR 定义为因严重并发症而死亡。回归分析用于控制人口统计学、手术干预类型、入院生命体征和入院实验室值。
共纳入 326 例老年 EGS 患者,其中 38.9%为虚弱。虚弱患者更可能是白人(P<0.01),入院时美国麻醉师协会分级更高(P=0.03),血清白蛋白水平更低(P<0.01)。然而,两组在年龄(P=0.54)、性别(P=0.56)、入院生命体征和白细胞计数(P=0.35)方面无差异。总体而言,26.7%(n=85)的患者发生院内并发症;这些患者中有 30%(n=26)死亡(即 FTR 组)。虚弱患者的 FTR 发生率更高(14% vs. 4%,P<0.001)。回归分析显示,在控制混杂因素后,虚弱状态是老年 EGS 患者 FTR 的独立预测因素(OR:3.4[2.3-4.6])。
我们的研究表明,在老年 EGS 患者中,虚弱状态独立导致 FTR,与非虚弱状态相比,FTR 的几率增加三倍。因此,它应该被纳入老年 EGS 患者的质量指标。