Han Xiaozhen, Gong Guiqing, Han Naili, Liu Mei
Department of Orthopedics, Jinan Zhangqiu District Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, No. 1463 Xiushui Street,Mingshui subdistrict office, Zhangqiu district, Jinan, 250200, Shandong, China.
Clinical Laboratory, Jinan Zhangqiu District Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, No. 1463 Xiushui Street,Mingshui subdistrict office, Zhangqiu district, Jinan, 250200, Shandong, China.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018 Dec 3;19(1):430. doi: 10.1186/s12891-018-2358-2.
Tranexamic acid (TXA) is an anti-fibrinolytic agent successfully preventing blood loss when using intravenously (IV) in total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). An oral administration, which is available on blood sparing, has been reported exhibit profound cost-saving benefits. The aim of this meta-analysis is to investigate whether the administration of oral and intravenous tranexamic acid postoperatively has equivalent blood-sparing properties in these patients.
The online electronic databases were searched for eligible literatures updated on September 2018. Studies assessing the effect between oral TXA and intravenous TXA (IV-TXA) in those undergoing TKA or THA were included. All the data were pooled with the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) using RevMan software. Based on the heterogeneity, we performed a systematic analysis to explore the overall results across the included studies.
Nine studies met our inclusion criteria. No significant differences were identified with regard to the Hb drop (SMD = - 0.03,95%CI = - 0.18-0.12, P = 0.67), total Hb loss (SMD = 0.10,95%CI = - 0.06-0.26, P = 0.24), total blood loss (SMD = - 0.00,95%CI = - 0.20-0.20, P = 1.00), transfusion rate (OR = 0.77,95%CI = 0.54-1.10, P = 0.14), DVT rate (OR = 0.58,95%CI = 0.19-1.75, P = 0.33), and length of hospital stay (SMD = - 0.05,95%CI = - 0.28-0.17, P = 0.63) between the oral groups and intravenous group.
The blood-sparing efficacy of oral TXA is similar to that of the intravenous forms in the setting of THA and TKA. Considering the cost-benefit superiority and ease of administration of oral TXA, further studies and clinical trials are required to further identify the optimal administration for THA and TKA.
氨甲环酸(TXA)是一种抗纤溶药物,在全髋关节置换术(THA)和全膝关节置换术(TKA)中静脉注射时能成功预防失血。据报道,口服给药在节约用血方面具有显著的成本效益优势。本荟萃分析的目的是研究在这些患者中术后口服和静脉注射氨甲环酸是否具有同等的节约用血特性。
检索在线电子数据库,查找2018年9月更新的符合条件的文献。纳入评估口服TXA与静脉注射TXA(IV-TXA)对接受TKA或THA患者效果的研究。使用RevMan软件将所有数据合并,并给出相应的95%置信区间(CI)。基于异质性,我们进行了系统分析以探索纳入研究的总体结果。
九项研究符合我们的纳入标准。口服组和静脉注射组在血红蛋白下降(标准化均值差[SMD]= -0.03,95%CI= -0.18至0.12,P=0.67)、总血红蛋白损失(SMD=0.10,95%CI= -0.06至0.26,P=0.24)、总失血量(SMD= -0.00,95%CI= -0.20至0.20,P=1.00)、输血率(比值比[OR]=0.77,95%CI=0.54至1.10,P=0.14)、深静脉血栓形成率(OR=0.58,95%CI=0.19至1.75,P=0.33)和住院时间(SMD= -0.05,95%CI= -0.28至0.17,P=0.63)方面未发现显著差异。
在THA和TKA中,口服TXA的节约用血效果与静脉注射形式相似。考虑到口服TXA的成本效益优势和给药便利性,需要进一步的研究和临床试验来进一步确定THA和TKA的最佳给药方式。