Suppr超能文献

紧急出口标志是什么颜色?出口行为与口头报告不同。

What color are emergency exit signs? Egress behavior differs from verbal report.

机构信息

National Research Council Canada, 1200 Montreal Road, Ottawa, ON, K1M 0R6, Canada.

Department of Cognitive, Linguistic, and Psychological Sciences, Brown University, Box 1821, Providence, RI 02912, USA.

出版信息

Appl Ergon. 2019 Feb;75:155-160. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2018.08.010. Epub 2018 Oct 11.

Abstract

Illuminated emergency exit signs inform building occupants about safe egress routes in emergencies. These exit signs are often found in the presence of other colored signs, which may distract occupants when searching for safe exits. Such distractions can lead to confusing and even harmful outcomes, especially if occupants misinterpret the sign colors, mistaking non-exit signs for exit signs. We studied which colored signs people were most likely to infer were exit signs in a simulated emergency evacuation using virtual reality (VR). Participants were immersed in a virtual room with two doors (left and right), and an illuminated sign with different colored vertical bars above each door. They saw all pairwise combinations of six sign colors across trials. On each trial, a fire alarm sounded, and participants walked to the door that they thought was the exit. We tested two hypotheses: a local exposure hypothesis that color inferences are determined by exit sign colors in the local environment (i.e., red) and a semantic association hypothesis that color inferences are determined by color-concept associations (i.e. green associated with "go" and "safety"). The results challenged the local exposure hypothesis and supported the semantic association hypothesis. Participants predominantly walked toward green signs, even though the exit signs in the local environment-including the building where the experiment took place-were red. However, in a post-experiment survey, most participants reported that exit signs should be red. The results demonstrated a dissociation between the way observers thought they would behave in emergency situations (red = exit) and the way they did behave in simulated emergencies (green = exit). These findings have implications for the design of evacuation systems. Observers, and perhaps designers, do not always anticipate how occupants will behave in emergency situations, which emphasizes the importance of behavioral evaluations for egress safety.

摘要

带照明的紧急出口标志可在紧急情况下向建筑物内的人员提供安全出口路线的信息。这些出口标志通常与其他颜色的标志一起出现,这可能会分散人员在寻找安全出口时的注意力。这种干扰可能会导致混淆,甚至产生有害后果,尤其是当人员错误地解释标志颜色,将非出口标志误认为出口标志时。我们使用虚拟现实 (VR) 研究了在模拟紧急疏散中人们最有可能推断出哪些带颜色的标志是出口标志。参与者沉浸在一个带有两扇门(左门和右门)和一个带有不同颜色竖条的照明标志的虚拟房间中。他们在试验中看到了六个标志颜色的所有两两组合。在每次试验中,火警响起,参与者走向他们认为是出口的门。我们测试了两个假设:局部暴露假设,即颜色推断取决于局部环境中的出口标志颜色(即红色)和语义联想假设,即颜色推断取决于颜色概念联想(即绿色与“前进”和“安全”相关联)。结果挑战了局部暴露假设,并支持了语义联想假设。尽管参与者所处的环境中的出口标志(包括实验所在的建筑物)是红色的,但他们主要走向绿色标志。然而,在实验后的问卷调查中,大多数参与者表示出口标志应为红色。结果表明,观察者在紧急情况下认为自己的行为方式(红色=出口)与他们在模拟紧急情况下的实际行为方式(绿色=出口)之间存在脱节。这些发现对疏散系统的设计具有启示意义。观察者,也许还有设计者,并不总是能预测到人员在紧急情况下的行为方式,这强调了对出口安全进行行为评估的重要性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验