Zettervall Sara L, Amata Andrew, Berger Jeffery S, Dangerfield Paul, Derkenne Ruth, Go Ramon, Jeon Deborah, Murphy Kiera, Phillips Molly, Sherman Marian, Vaziri Khashayar
J Educ Perioper Med. 2018 Jul 1;20(3):E626. eCollection 2018 Jul-Sep.
The use of epidural analgesia for laboring women is generally unavailable at public hospitals in Guyana despite favorable utilization rates in private institutions. In 2014, a healthcare team completed a targeted mission aimed at neuraxial analgesia training of providers at the preeminent public hospital in Georgetown, Guyana. This study evaluates the impact of the training, including provider attitudes, use, and barriers.
A prospective, mixed methods study of all obstetric, nursing, and anesthesiology providers at Georgetown Public Hospital Corporation was completed. Quantitative assessment of the posttraining use of epidural analgesia at 2 and 6 months was documented. Provider surveys were distributed anonymously at 2 months posttraining. Targeted interviews were completed from a random sampling of providers at 6 months; qualitative analysis of interviews formulated the basis for reporting limitations and barriers.
Providers surveyed included 7 anesthesia providers and 24 obstetrics providers. Respondents believed Guyanese women should be offered epidural analgesia (93%), epidurals could be performed safely (87%), and Guyana has the resources necessary for routine use (81%). In assessing epidural knowledge, anesthesia providers achieved 60% correct response rate compared to 84% among obstetrics providers. Nurse anesthetists placed 16 epidurals following training. However, placement ceased after 2 months. The largest barriers to placement were unavailable anesthesia staff (63%), lack of supplies (16%), and insufficient nursing staff to monitor patients with epidurals (11%).
A 1-week mission achieved widespread Guyanese provider acceptance despite a lack of previous experience. However, barriers proved insurmountable to achieving a sustainable, independently functioning epidural analgesia program.
尽管在圭亚那的私立机构中硬膜外镇痛在分娩妇女中的使用率较高,但圭亚那的公立医院通常无法为分娩妇女提供硬膜外镇痛服务。2014年,一个医疗团队完成了一项针对性任务,旨在对圭亚那乔治敦一家著名公立医院的医护人员进行神经轴索镇痛培训。本研究评估了该培训的影响,包括医护人员的态度、使用情况和障碍。
对乔治敦公立医院公司的所有产科、护理和麻醉科医护人员进行了一项前瞻性混合方法研究。记录了培训后2个月和6个月时硬膜外镇痛使用情况的定量评估。培训后2个月对医护人员进行了匿名问卷调查。在6个月时从医护人员中随机抽样进行针对性访谈;对访谈的定性分析构成了报告局限性和障碍的基础。
接受调查的医护人员包括7名麻醉科医护人员和24名产科医护人员。受访者认为应该为圭亚那妇女提供硬膜外镇痛(93%),硬膜外镇痛可以安全实施(87%),并且圭亚那拥有常规使用所需的资源(81%)。在评估硬膜外知识时,麻醉科医护人员的正确回答率为60%,而产科医护人员为84%。护士麻醉师在培训后实施了16例硬膜外镇痛。然而,2个月后就不再实施了。实施硬膜外镇痛的最大障碍是麻醉人员不足(63%)、用品短缺(16%)以及没有足够的护理人员来监测硬膜外镇痛患者(11%)。
尽管此前缺乏经验,但为期1周的任务使圭亚那的医护人员广泛接受了硬膜外镇痛。然而,事实证明,障碍是无法克服的,无法建立一个可持续、独立运作的硬膜外镇痛项目。