Salvo Grazia, Lashewicz Bonnie M, Doyle-Baker Patricia K, McCormack Gavin R
Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada T2N 4Z6.
Faculty of Kinesiology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada T2N 1N4.
J Environ Public Health. 2018 Nov 1;2018:1094812. doi: 10.1155/2018/1094812. eCollection 2018.
Despite evidence suggesting that neighbourhood characteristics are associated with physical activity, very few mixed methods studies investigate how relocating neighbourhood, and subsequent changes in the built environment, influences physical activity. This sequential mixed methods study estimates associations between changes in overall physical activity and transportation walking and cycling and changes in objectively assessed neighbourhood walkability (quantitative phase) and describes perceived barriers and facilitators to physical activity following residential relocation (qualitative phase). During the quantitative phase, self-reported changes in transportation walking, transportation cycling, and overall physical activity following residential relocation were measured using a 5-point scale: (1) a lot less now, (2) a little less now, (3) about the same, (4) a little more now, and (5) a lot more now. Walkability improvers reported a slight increase in transportation walking (mean = 3.29, standard deviation (SD) = 0.87), while walkability decliners reported little or no perceived change in their transportation walking after relocation (mean = 2.96, SD = 1.12). This difference approached statistical significance (=0.053). Furthermore, walkability decliners reported a slight decrease in transportation cycling (mean = 2.69, SD = 0.96), while walkability improvers reported little or no perceived change in their transportation cycling after relocation (mean = 3.02, SD = 0.84). This difference was statistically significant ( < 0.05). Change in walkability resulting from relocation was not significantly associated with perceived change in overall physical activity. Our qualitative findings suggest that moving to a neighbourhood with safe paths connecting to nearby destinations can facilitate transportation walking and cycling. Some participants describe adjusting their leisure physical activity to compensate for changes in transportation walking and cycling. Strong contributors to neighbourhood leisure physical activity included the presence of aesthetic features and availability of recreational opportunities that allow for the creation of social connections with community and family.
尽管有证据表明社区特征与身体活动有关,但很少有混合方法研究探讨社区搬迁以及随之而来的建筑环境变化如何影响身体活动。这项顺序混合方法研究估计了总体身体活动和交通步行与骑行的变化与客观评估的社区步行适宜性变化之间的关联(定量阶段),并描述了居住搬迁后身体活动的感知障碍和促进因素(定性阶段)。在定量阶段,使用5分制量表测量居住搬迁后交通步行、交通骑行和总体身体活动的自我报告变化:(1)现在少很多,(2)现在少一点,(3)大致相同,(4)现在多一点,(5)现在多很多。步行适宜性改善者报告交通步行略有增加(均值 = 3.29,标准差(SD)= 0.87),而步行适宜性下降者报告搬迁后交通步行几乎没有或没有感知到变化(均值 = 2.96,SD = 1.12)。这种差异接近统计学显著性(= 0.053)。此外,步行适宜性下降者报告交通骑行略有减少(均值 = 2.69,SD = 0.96),而步行适宜性改善者报告搬迁后交通骑行几乎没有或没有感知到变化(均值 = 3.02,SD = 0.84)。这种差异具有统计学显著性(< 0.05)。搬迁导致的步行适宜性变化与总体身体活动的感知变化没有显著关联。我们的定性研究结果表明,搬到一个有安全路径连接附近目的地的社区可以促进交通步行和骑行。一些参与者描述了调整他们的休闲身体活动以补偿交通步行和骑行的变化。社区休闲身体活动的重要促成因素包括美学特征的存在以及娱乐机会的可用性,这些机会有助于与社区和家庭建立社会联系。