Kaas Bonnie M, Humbyrd Casey Jo, Pantelyat Alexander
Department of Neurology Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore MD.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore MD.
Mov Disord Clin Pract. 2018 Oct 9;5(5):471-478. doi: 10.1002/mdc3.12641. eCollection 2018 Sep-Oct.
Functional movement disorders are common and disabling neurologic conditions. Patients with functional neurologic disorders represent a large proportion of neurology clinic referrals, and limited availability of subspecialty care creates a considerable burden for the healthcare system. These conditions are currently treated with a combination of physical therapy and cognitive behavioral therapy, with variable success.
We searched the Medline database for studies on the epidemiology and physiology of functional movement disorders, as well as those on the placebo effect in movement disorders. We reviewed and summarized the literature on these topics and explored ethical issues concerning the administration of placebos to patients with functional movement disorders.
Studies of placebos, particularly in patients with movement disorders, have shown that these "inert" agents can provide demonstrable neurophysiologic benefits, even in open-label studies. Physician surveys have shown that many administer placebos for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes, although there are ethical concerns about this practice. We used a principle-based approach and reviewed ethical arguments for (justice and beneficence) and against (non-maleficence and autonomy) the use of placebos in functional movement disorders. In this context, we argue for the importance of the therapeutic alliance in preserving patient autonomy while exploring the potential benefits of placebo therapy.
An ethical argument is presented in support of nondeceptive clinical placebo use for the treatment of functional movement disorders. Patient and clinician attitudes regarding the use of placebos should be investigated before placebo-therapy trials are conducted.
功能性运动障碍是常见的致残性神经系统疾病。功能性神经系统疾病患者在神经内科门诊转诊患者中占很大比例,而专科护理的可及性有限给医疗系统带来了相当大的负担。目前这些疾病采用物理治疗和认知行为治疗相结合的方法进行治疗,效果不一。
我们在Medline数据库中检索了关于功能性运动障碍的流行病学和生理学研究,以及关于运动障碍中安慰剂效应的研究。我们对这些主题的文献进行了综述和总结,并探讨了对功能性运动障碍患者使用安慰剂的伦理问题。
对安慰剂的研究,特别是对运动障碍患者的研究表明,即使在开放标签研究中,这些“无活性”药物也能带来明显的神经生理学益处。医生调查显示,许多医生出于诊断和治疗目的使用安慰剂,尽管这种做法存在伦理问题。我们采用基于原则的方法,审视了支持(公正和仁爱)和反对(不伤害和自主)在功能性运动障碍中使用安慰剂的伦理观点。在此背景下,我们主张治疗联盟在探索安慰剂治疗潜在益处的同时维护患者自主性的重要性。
提出了一项伦理观点,支持在治疗功能性运动障碍时进行非欺骗性的临床安慰剂使用。在进行安慰剂治疗试验之前,应调查患者和临床医生对使用安慰剂的态度。