Suppr超能文献

记录数量对静息和收缩时肌肉僵硬度肌动测量法可靠性的影响。

Influence of number of records on reliability of myotonometric measurements of muscle stiffness at rest and contraction.

作者信息

Marusiak Jarosław, Jarocka Ewa, Jaskólska Anna, Jaskólski Artur

机构信息

Department of Kinesiology, Faculty of Physiotherapy, University School of Physical Education, Wrocław, Poland.

Physiology Section, Department of Integrative Medical Biology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.

出版信息

Acta Bioeng Biomech. 2018;20(4):123-131.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to determine an effect of myotonometric records' number on stiffness measurements' reliability in muscles at rest and contraction.

METHODS

Muscle stiffness was measured using Myoton-3 device. Twenty records were taken for: (i) biceps (BB) and triceps brachii (TB) at rest and for BB at 10% of maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) in healthy elderlies (HE) and in Parkinson's disease patients (PD); and (ii) brachioradialis (BR) at rest and at 25, 50 and 80% MVC in healthy young (HY) subjects. Also, in HY group, the 3-records mode was used for BR's measurements at maximal contraction. Each measurement taken with 20-records was classed into five records groups: the whole 20- and the first 15-, 10-, 5- and 3-records. Test-retest reliability for these records groups was analyzed.

RESULTS

In HE and PD group measurements' reliability was excellent for all groups of records (20-3 rec- ords). In HY group, for the five groups of records taken at rest and submaximal levels of contraction (25, 50 and 80% MVC) the meas- urements reliability: (i) was mostly excellent or rarely average; and (ii) only in one per three 50% MVC conditions was unacceptable, i.e., for the 3-records group. The reliability of 3-records mode measurements at maximal contraction were unacceptable.

CONCLUSIONS

Reliable myotonometric stiffness measurements in muscles at rest and during submaximal contractions can be achieved with less than 20 records (15, 10, 5 records) and even for the most of measurements with 3 records in HY and HE as well as in the PD patients. Myotonometric stiffness measurements with 3-records mode during maximal contraction were not reliable.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是确定肌张力测量记录的数量对静息和收缩状态下肌肉刚度测量可靠性的影响。

方法

使用Myoton-3设备测量肌肉刚度。在健康老年人(HE)和帕金森病患者(PD)中,对肱二头肌(BB)和肱三头肌(TB)在静息状态下以及对BB在最大自主收缩(MVC)的10%时进行了20次记录;在健康年轻人(HY)中,对肱桡肌(BR)在静息状态下以及在MVC的25%、50%和80%时进行了记录。此外,在HY组中,在最大收缩时对BR的测量采用了3次记录模式。将每次20次记录的测量分为五个记录组:完整的20次记录以及前15次、10次、5次和3次记录。分析了这些记录组的重测可靠性。

结果

在HE和PD组中,所有记录组(20 - 3次记录)的测量可靠性都非常好。在HY组中,对于在静息和次最大收缩水平(25%、50%和80%MVC)下获取的五组记录,测量可靠性:(i)大多非常好或很少为中等;(ii)每三个50%MVC条件中只有一个不可接受,即对于3次记录组。最大收缩时3次记录模式测量的可靠性不可接受。

结论

在静息和次最大收缩期间,使用少于20次记录(15次、10次、5次记录)甚至对于HY、HE以及PD患者中的大多数测量使用3次记录,都可以实现可靠的肌张力刚度测量。最大收缩期间3次记录模式的肌张力刚度测量不可靠。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验