Department of Psychiatry, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, PA3.227, PO box 22660, 1100DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Brain Imaging Center, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Neuropsychol Rev. 2019 Mar;29(1):116-138. doi: 10.1007/s11065-018-9393-5. Epub 2018 Dec 7.
It is important to find new treatments for addiction due to high relapse rates despite current interventions and due to expansion of the field with non-substance related addictive behaviors. Neuromodulation may provide a new type of treatment for addiction since it can directly target abnormalities in neurocircuits. We review literature on five neuromodulation techniques investigated for efficacy in substance related and behavioral addictions: transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), (repetitive) transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), EEG, fMRI neurofeedback and deep brain stimulation (DBS) and additionally report on effects of these interventions on addiction-related cognitive processes. While rTMS and tDCS, mostly applied at the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, show reductions in immediate craving for various addictive substances, placebo-responses are high and long-term outcomes are understudied. The lack in well-designed EEG-neurofeedback studies despite decades of investigation impedes conclusions about its efficacy. Studies investigating fMRI neurofeedback are new and show initial promising effects on craving, but future trials are needed to investigate long-term and behavioral effects. Case studies report prolonged abstinence of opioids or alcohol with ventral striatal DBS but difficulties with patient inclusion may hinder larger, controlled trials. DBS in neuropsychiatric patients modulates brain circuits involved in reward processing, extinction and negative-reinforcement that are also relevant for addiction. To establish the potential of neuromodulation for addiction, more randomized controlled trials are needed that also investigate treatment duration required for long-term abstinence and potential synergy with other addiction interventions. Finally, future advancement may be expected from tailoring neuromodulation techniques to specific patient (neurocognitive) profiles.
由于当前干预措施的复发率高,并且由于与非物质相关的成瘾行为领域的扩展,因此寻找新的成瘾治疗方法非常重要。神经调节可能为成瘾提供一种新的治疗方法,因为它可以直接针对神经回路的异常。我们回顾了五种已被研究用于治疗物质相关和行为成瘾的神经调节技术的文献:经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)、(重复)经颅磁刺激(rTMS)、脑电图、功能磁共振成像神经反馈和深部脑刺激(DBS),并报告了这些干预措施对与成瘾相关的认知过程的影响。虽然 rTMS 和 tDCS 主要应用于背外侧前额叶皮层,可减少对各种成瘾物质的即时渴望,但安慰剂反应率很高,长期结果研究不足。尽管经过几十年的研究,缺乏精心设计的脑电图神经反馈研究妨碍了对其疗效的结论。研究 fMRI 神经反馈的研究是新的,显示出对渴望的初步积极影响,但需要进一步的试验来研究长期和行为效果。病例研究报告了腹侧纹状体 DBS 可延长阿片类药物或酒精的戒断期,但患者纳入的困难可能会阻碍更大规模的对照试验。神经精神疾病患者的 DBS 调节了与奖励处理、消退和负强化相关的大脑回路,这些回路也与成瘾有关。为了确定神经调节对成瘾的潜在作用,需要更多的随机对照试验,这些试验还需要研究长期戒断所需的治疗时间以及与其他成瘾干预措施的潜在协同作用。最后,可以预期通过将神经调节技术定制为特定患者(神经认知)的特征来实现未来的发展。