Suppr超能文献

荷兰保乳治疗中提升放疗使用的变化:国家指南和共同构成因素的影响。

Variation in the Use of Boost Irradiation in Breast-Conserving Therapy in the Netherlands: The Effect of a National Guideline and Cofounding Factors.

机构信息

Department of Research, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization (IKNL), Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Health Technology and Services Research, MIRA Institute for Biomedical Technology and Technical Medicine, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands; Scientific Committee NABON Breast Cancer Audit (NBCA), the Netherlands.

Scientific Committee NABON Breast Cancer Audit (NBCA), the Netherlands; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2019 Apr;31(4):250-259. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2018.11.033. Epub 2018 Dec 8.

Abstract

AIMS

To determine the variation in radiation therapy boost use in a nationwide study following adjustment of a national guideline in 2011, as well as to address the relationship to patient, tumour and radiation therapy institutional factors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All invasive breast cancers and non-invasive breast cancers (ductal carcinoma in situ; DCIS) that received external whole-breast radiation between 2011 and 2016 were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Box plots were used to evaluate variation over time and logistic regression was carried out to address other factors influencing the variation. Funnel plots were constructed, with unadjusted and adjusted data for patient and tumour factors significantly affecting the use of a boost.

RESULTS

For breast cancer patients (n = 45,207), the proportion receiving a boost and its range decreased over the years from 37.3-92.7% in 2011 to 28.3-65.4% in 2016. This trend was not observed in DCIS patients (n = 6,844). Young age, large tumours, high grade and the absence of tumour-free resection margins were associated with boost use for both breast cancer and DCIS. For breast cancer, triple-negative tumour subtype and metastatic lymph node involvement were also associated with boost use. Institutional factors did not influence the use of a boost and institutional variation remained substantial after case-mix adjustments.

CONCLUSION

Following adjustment of a nationwide implemented guideline, variation in radiation therapy boost use decreased in patients with breast cancer but not in patients with DCIS. Several tumour and patient characteristics were associated with boost use. Substantial institutional variation could not be explained by differences in patient, tumour or predefined institutional characteristics.

摘要

目的

在 2011 年调整国家指南后,通过一项全国性研究来确定放疗增敏的使用变化,以及解决与患者、肿瘤和放疗机构因素的关系。

材料和方法

从荷兰癌症登记处选择了 2011 年至 2016 年间接受全乳腺外部放疗的所有浸润性乳腺癌和非浸润性乳腺癌(导管原位癌;DCIS)。箱线图用于评估随时间的变化,逻辑回归用于解决影响变化的其他因素。构建了漏斗图,对患者和肿瘤因素的未调整和调整数据进行了分析,这些因素显著影响增敏的使用。

结果

对于乳腺癌患者(n=45207),接受增敏治疗的比例及其范围在 2011 年的 37.3-92.7%至 2016 年的 28.3-65.4%逐年下降。然而,在 DCIS 患者(n=6844)中并没有观察到这种趋势。年轻、大肿瘤、高分级和无肿瘤切缘的患者接受增敏治疗的比例较高,无论是乳腺癌还是 DCIS 患者。对于乳腺癌,三阴性肿瘤亚型和转移性淋巴结受累也与增敏治疗的使用有关。机构因素对增敏治疗的使用没有影响,且在病例组合调整后,机构间的差异仍然很大。

结论

在全国范围内实施的指南调整后,乳腺癌患者放疗增敏的使用变化减少了,但 DCIS 患者则没有。一些肿瘤和患者特征与增敏治疗的使用有关。机构间的差异不能用患者、肿瘤或预设的机构特征的差异来解释。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验