Pastorek J G, Mroczkowski T F, Martin D H
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Louisiana State University Medical Center, New Orleans.
Obstet Gynecol. 1988 Dec;72(6):957-60. doi: 10.1097/00006250-198812000-00033.
Endocervical specimens from 168 asymptomatic women in the second trimester of pregnancy were screened for Chlamydia trachomatis infection with both standard tissue culture methods and a direct fluorescein-conjugated monoclonal antibody assay (MicroTrak). Based on tissue culture results, the prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis was 26.2% in this population. Compared with tissue culture, the monoclonal antibody assay's sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value varied depending upon how many elementary bodies were used to define a positive test. Specifically, if a cutoff of ten elementary bodies was used (as per the manufacturer's instructions), the sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value of this test were 86.3, 98.4, and 95.0%, respectively. At the other extreme, a cutoff of one elementary body produced a more sensitive but less specific test, with parameters of 93.2, 89.5, and 75.9%, respectively. Based on these data and operating characteristic analysis, the cutoff value defining a positive test was appropriately set at two or more elementary bodies, at least for this study population. This resulted in a sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value of 93.2, 95.2, and 87.2%, respectively. This monoclonal antibody assay appears to be a reasonable substitute for cell culture for Chlamydia trachomatis. However, because of varying magnitudes and implications of false-positive and false-negative tests, clinicians are urged to determine the appropriate breakpoint for their individual laboratories and patient populations before substituting the direct fluorescent antibody test for tissue culture.