Atabati Hadi, Raoofi Amir, Amini Abdollah, Farahani Reza Masteri
Leishmaniasis Research Center, Sabzevar University of Medical Sciences, Sabzevar, Iran.
Student Research Committee, Department of Biology and Anatomical Sciences, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2018 Nov 20;6(11):1977-1981. doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2018.455. eCollection 2018 Nov 25.
In patients with breast cancer, gene expression is of a great importance in reacting to Herceptin treatment. To evaluate this event, immunohistochemistry (IHC) has been done routinely on the basis of scoring it and so the patients were divided into 4 groups. Lately, as there have been disagreements about how to treat score 2 patients, chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) and florescence in situ hybridization (FISH) are introduced. Since CISH method is more convenient than FISH for gene amplification study, FISH has been substituted by CISH.
The current study is conducted in order to investigate whether using CISH is a better method comparison to IHC method for determines HER2 expression in patients with breast cancer in.
In this cross-sectional descriptive analytical study, information of 44 female patients with invasive ductal breast cancer were gathered from Imam Reza and Omid Hospital in Mashhad. IHC staining was done for all patients in order to determine the level of HER2 expression, and after scoring them into 4 groups of 0, +1, +2 and +3, CISH staining was carried out for all 4 groups. At the end, results from both methods were statistically evaluated using SPSS software V.22.0.
The average age of patients was 50.2 with the standard deviation of 10.96. Using IHC method was observed that 2.6% (1 patient), 26.3% (10 patients), 65.8% (25 patients) and 5.3% (2 patients) percentage of patients had scores of 0, +1, +2 and +3. On the other hand, CISH method showed 36 patients (90%) with no amplifications and 4 (10%) with sever amplifications. In a comparative study using Fisher's exact test (p = 0.000), we found a significant relation between IHC method and CISH method indicating that all patients showing severe amplifications in CISH method, owned scores of +2 and +3 in IHC method.
According to the present study and comparing the results with similar previous studies, it can be concluded that CISH method works highly effective in determining HER2 expression level in patients with breast cancer. This method is also able to determine the status of patients with score +2 in IHC for their treatment with herceptin.
在乳腺癌患者中,基因表达对于赫赛汀治疗的反应至关重要。为评估这一情况,免疫组织化学(IHC)已常规进行评分,并据此将患者分为4组。最近,由于对于如何治疗2分患者存在分歧,引入了显色原位杂交(CISH)和荧光原位杂交(FISH)。由于CISH方法在基因扩增研究中比FISH更方便,FISH已被CISH取代。
本研究旨在调查与IHC方法相比,使用CISH是否是确定乳腺癌患者HER2表达的更好方法。
在这项横断面描述性分析研究中,从马什哈德的伊玛目礼萨医院和奥米德医院收集了44例浸润性导管癌女性患者的信息。对所有患者进行IHC染色以确定HER2表达水平,在将她们分为0、+1、+2和+3四组后,对所有四组进行CISH染色。最后,使用SPSS软件V.22.0对两种方法的结果进行统计学评估。
患者的平均年龄为50.2岁,标准差为10.96。使用IHC方法观察到,分别有2.6%(1例患者)、26.3%(10例患者)、65.8%(25例患者)和5.3%(2例患者)的患者评分为0、+1、+2和+3。另一方面,CISH方法显示36例患者(90%)无扩增,4例(10%)有严重扩增。在使用Fisher精确检验(p = 0.000)的比较研究中,我们发现IHC方法和CISH方法之间存在显著关系,表明在CISH方法中显示严重扩增的所有患者,在IHC方法中的评分为+2和+3。
根据本研究并将结果与之前的类似研究进行比较,可以得出结论,CISH方法在确定乳腺癌患者HER2表达水平方面非常有效。该方法还能够确定IHC评分为+2的患者使用赫赛汀治疗的情况。