Suppr超能文献

外照射放射治疗计划的稳健性分析:描述不确定性情景并报告其剂量学后果。

Robustness Analysis for External Beam Radiation Therapy Treatment Plans: Describing Uncertainty Scenarios and Reporting Their Dosimetric Consequences.

机构信息

Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.

University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.

出版信息

Pract Radiat Oncol. 2019 Jul-Aug;9(4):200-207. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2018.12.002. Epub 2018 Dec 15.

Abstract

PURPOSE

With external beam radiation therapy, uncertainties in treatment planning and delivery can result in an undesirable dose distribution delivered to the patient that can compromise the benefit of treatment. Techniques including geometric margins and probabilistic optimization have been used effectively to mitigate the effects of uncertainties. However, their broad application is inconsistent and can compromise the conclusions derived from cross-technique and cross-modality comparisons.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Conventional methods to deal with treatment planning and delivery uncertainties are described, and robustness analysis is presented as a framework that is applicable across treatment techniques and modalities.

RESULTS

This report identifies elements that are imperative to include when conducting a robustness analysis and describing uncertainties and their dosimetric effects.

CONCLUSION

The robustness analysis approach described here is presented to promote reliable plan evaluation and dose reporting, particularly during clinical trials conducted across institutions and treatment modalities.

摘要

目的

在采用外部束放射治疗时,治疗计划和实施中的不确定性可能导致患者接受不理想的剂量分布,从而影响治疗效果。已采用包括几何边界和概率优化等技术来有效减轻不确定性的影响。但是,这些技术的广泛应用并不一致,并且可能影响跨技术和跨模式比较得出的结论。

方法和材料

描述了处理治疗计划和实施不确定性的常规方法,并提出稳健性分析作为适用于各种治疗技术和模式的框架。

结果

本报告确定了进行稳健性分析和描述不确定性及其剂量学效应时必须包含的要素。

结论

此处介绍的稳健性分析方法旨在促进可靠的计划评估和剂量报告,特别是在跨机构和治疗模式进行临床试验期间。

相似文献

2
Development of a Monte Carlo based robustness calculation and evaluation tool.
Med Phys. 2022 Jul;49(7):4780-4793. doi: 10.1002/mp.15683. Epub 2022 May 4.
3
Evaluation of OAR dose sparing and plan robustness of beam-specific PTV in lung cancer IMRT treatment.
Radiat Oncol. 2020 Oct 17;15(1):241. doi: 10.1186/s13014-020-01686-1.
4
A robust evaluation of 49 high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy treatment plans including all major uncertainties.
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2024 Feb;25(2):e14182. doi: 10.1002/acm2.14182. Epub 2023 Oct 14.
5
Uncertainty incorporated beam angle optimization for IMPT treatment planning.
Med Phys. 2012 Aug;39(8):5248-56. doi: 10.1118/1.4737870.
8
Impact of Gaussian uncertainty assumptions on probabilistic optimization in particle therapy.
Phys Med Biol. 2020 Jul 15;65(14):145007. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab8d77.
10
Evaluation of dosimetric uncertainty caused by MR geometric distortion in MRI-based liver SBRT treatment planning.
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2019 Feb;20(2):43-50. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12520. Epub 2019 Jan 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of a Multi-Scenario Robustness Evaluation Method with Measurements for Proton Teletherapy.
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Sep 6;17(17):2927. doi: 10.3390/cancers17172927.
2
Pelvic dose accumulation accuracy in a CBCT based online adaptive radiotherapy system.
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2025 Jul;26(7):e70160. doi: 10.1002/acm2.70160.
4
Comparison of online adaptive and non-adaptive magnetic resonance image-guided radiation therapy in prostate cancer using dose accumulation.
Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2024 Oct 28;32:100662. doi: 10.1016/j.phro.2024.100662. eCollection 2024 Oct.
5
Dosimetric Study and Robustness Analysis of Base Note Intensive Locked Field Radiotherapy for Left Breast Cancer.
Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press). 2024 Jul 30;16:433-450. doi: 10.2147/BCTT.S447955. eCollection 2024.
8
A robust evaluation of 49 high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy treatment plans including all major uncertainties.
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2024 Feb;25(2):e14182. doi: 10.1002/acm2.14182. Epub 2023 Oct 14.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of imaging frequency on PTV margins and geographical miss during image guided radiation therapy for prostate cancer.
Pract Radiat Oncol. 2018 Mar-Apr;8(2):e41-e47. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2017.09.010. Epub 2017 Oct 7.
2
Incorporation of relative biological effectiveness uncertainties into proton plan robustness evaluation.
Acta Oncol. 2017 Jun;56(6):769-778. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2017.1290825. Epub 2017 Feb 28.
4
Image-guided radiotherapy for prostate cancer with cone beam CT: dosimetric effects of imaging frequency and PTV margin.
Radiother Oncol. 2016 Oct;121(1):103-108. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.07.018. Epub 2016 Aug 28.
5
Target margins in radiotherapy of prostate cancer.
Br J Radiol. 2016 Nov;89(1067):20160312. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20160312. Epub 2016 Jul 20.
6
Fast and accurate sensitivity analysis of IMPT treatment plans using Polynomial Chaos Expansion.
Phys Med Biol. 2016 Jun 21;61(12):4646-64. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/61/12/4646. Epub 2016 May 26.
7
MRI-guided prostate adaptive radiotherapy - A systematic review.
Radiother Oncol. 2016 Jun;119(3):371-80. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.04.014. Epub 2016 May 6.
8
The scenario-based generalization of radiation therapy margins.
Phys Med Biol. 2016 Mar 7;61(5):2067-82. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/61/5/2067. Epub 2016 Feb 19.
9
Margin reduction from image guided radiation therapy for soft tissue sarcoma: Secondary analysis of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 0630 results.
Pract Radiat Oncol. 2016 Jul-Aug;6(4):e135-e140. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2015.11.012. Epub 2015 Nov 17.
10
Exploratory Study of 4D versus 3D Robust Optimization in Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy for Lung Cancer.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016 May 1;95(1):523-533. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.11.002. Epub 2015 Nov 10.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验