Suppr超能文献

贫中营养型水库中的浮游动物群落特征:两种采样策略的比较研究

Zooplankton community attributes in an oligo-mesotrophic reservoir: A comparative study of two sampling strategies.

作者信息

Macêdo Rafael L, Lopes Vanessa G, Kozlowskysuzuki Betina, Branco Christina W C

机构信息

Núcleo de Estudos Limnológicos, Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Biociências, Centro de Ciências Biológicas e da Saúde, Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro/UNIRIO, Av. Pasteur, 458, 22290-240 Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.

Laboratório de Ecologia Teórica e Síntese/LETS, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas/ICB, Universidade Federal de Goiás/UFG, Av. Esperança, s/n, 64690-900 Goiânia, GO, Brazil.

出版信息

An Acad Bras Cienc. 2019;91(1):e20170807. doi: 10.1590/0001-3765201820170807. Epub 2018 Dec 17.

Abstract

Studies of the limnetic zooplankton in Brazilian freshwater have been done using several sampling strategies which are frequently associated to personal preferences, system constraints and objectives of the studies. It is known that a better sampling technique exists for each group of investigated zooplankton. So, the challenge is to provide a good sampling method for all groups at once. Regarding this theme we are contributing by pointing out the merits and demerits of two collecting methods of zooplankton widely used in many studies in Brazilian reservoirs to clarify the information about communities' structure in past published and non-published biological data and also find a more useful sampler for future studies. Two simultaneous strategies were used with a 68μm-plankton net: filtration of water collected at sub-surface by bucket and vertical hauls throughout the euphotic zone. A total of 133 taxa was found with both strategies. Rotifers (69 taxa) comprised the group with the highest richness, followed by protozoans (31 taxa), cladocerans (30 taxa) and copepods (5 taxa). Paired t-tests showed significant difference for richness despite none for density in whole period. Spatially, sampling strategies differed in abundance and composition of zooplankton at most sites sampled (except for L1- shallowest site and L4 - deepest site). Temporally, both samplers showed the highest mean abundances at thermal stratification period. In general, the extent of spatial data collected throughout the vertical gradient provided better estimations in the limnetic area for the attributes analyzed: zooplankton density, richness, specific diversity, equitability and cumulative richness. Zooplankton sampling by vertical hauls through the euphotic zone was more efficient, but in order to obtain integrated data and according to the collector's curve it might be useful to adopt both methodologies.

摘要

针对巴西淡水湖泊浮游动物的研究采用了多种采样策略,这些策略常常与个人偏好、系统限制以及研究目的相关。众所周知,对于每一组被调查的浮游动物都存在一种更好的采样技术。因此,挑战在于同时为所有组提供一种良好的采样方法。关于这个主题,我们通过指出在巴西水库的许多研究中广泛使用的两种浮游动物采集方法的优缺点来做出贡献,以阐明过去已发表和未发表的生物学数据中有关群落结构的信息,并为未来的研究找到一种更有用的采样器。使用一个68μm的浮游生物网同时采用了两种策略:用桶采集表层以下的水样进行过滤,以及在整个真光层进行垂直拖网。两种策略共发现了133个分类单元。轮虫(69个分类单元)是丰富度最高的类群,其次是原生动物(31个分类单元)、枝角类(30个分类单元)和桡足类(5个分类单元)。配对t检验显示,尽管在整个时期密度无显著差异,但丰富度存在显著差异。在空间上,在大多数采样点(除了最浅的L1点和最深的L4点),采样策略在浮游动物的丰度和组成上存在差异。在时间上,两种采样器在热分层期的平均丰度最高。总体而言,在整个垂直梯度上收集的空间数据范围为分析的湖泊属性(浮游动物密度、丰富度、特定多样性、公平性和累积丰富度)提供了更好的估计。通过在真光层进行垂直拖网采样浮游动物更有效,但为了获得综合数据并根据采集者曲线,采用两种方法可能会很有用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验