Suppr超能文献

钆在眼部结构中的渗漏在腔隙性梗死中很常见。

Gadolinium Leakage in Ocular Structures Is Common in Lacunar Infarction.

作者信息

Förster Alex, Al-Zghloul Mansour, Wenz Holger, Böhme Johannes, Groden Christoph, Alonso Angelika

机构信息

From the Department of Neuroradiology (A.F., M.A.-Z., H.W., J.B., C.G.), Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.

Department of Neurology (A.A.), Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.

出版信息

Stroke. 2019 Jan;50(1):193-195. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.023573. Epub 2018 Nov 21.

Abstract

Background and Purpose- We investigated the frequency and pattern of blood-brain barrier, as well as blood-retina barrier, impairment in acute lacunar infarction as demonstrated by hyperintense acute reperfusion marker and gadolinium leakage in ocular structures (GLOS), respectively, on fluid-attenuated inversion recovery images. Methods- Acute lacunar infarction patients who underwent repeated magnetic resonance imaging after intravenous contrast agent administration were identified and the presence of GLOS in the anterior chamber and vitreous body and hyperintense acute reperfusion marker noted on fluid-attenuated inversion recovery. Results- Overall, 24 acute lacunar infarction patients (median age 64.5 years; interquartile range, 54-78 years) were included. On contrast-enhanced fluid-attenuated inversion recovery, GLOS was observed in 11 (45.8%) patients: in 4 (16.7%) in the anterior chamber only and in 7 (29.2%) in the anterior chamber and vitreous body. In all patients, GLOS was bilateral and symmetrical. In patients with GLOS in the anterior chamber only, the time between initial and follow-up magnetic resonance imaging was significantly shorter (7.5 [interquartile range, 4.25-11.5] hours) compared with patients with GLOS in the anterior chamber and vitreous body (28 [interquartile range, 10-43] hours; =0.047). Hyperintense acute reperfusion marker could not be demonstrated in any of the patients. Conclusions- In acute lacunar infarction patients, unlike hyperintense acute reperfusion marker, GLOS is a frequent finding and shows a similar temporal evolution like in larger ischemic stroke.

摘要

背景与目的——我们分别通过液体衰减反转恢复序列图像上的高强化急性再灌注标记物和眼部结构钆渗漏(GLOS),研究急性腔隙性脑梗死中血脑屏障以及血视网膜屏障损伤的频率和模式。方法——确定静脉注射造影剂后接受重复磁共振成像检查的急性腔隙性脑梗死患者,并记录液体衰减反转恢复序列上眼前房和玻璃体中GLOS的存在情况以及高强化急性再灌注标记物。结果——总共纳入24例急性腔隙性脑梗死患者(中位年龄64.5岁;四分位间距,54 - 78岁)。在对比增强液体衰减反转恢复序列上,11例(45.8%)患者观察到GLOS:仅4例(16.7%)出现在前房,7例(29.2%)出现在前房和玻璃体。所有患者的GLOS均为双侧且对称。仅在前房出现GLOS的患者,初始与随访磁共振成像之间的时间显著短于前房和玻璃体均出现GLOS的患者(7.5 [四分位间距,4.25 - 11.5]小时对比28 [四分位间距,10 - 43]小时;P = 0.047)。所有患者均未显示高强化急性再灌注标记物。结论——在急性腔隙性脑梗死患者中,与高强化急性再灌注标记物不同,GLOS是常见表现,且显示出与较大缺血性卒中相似的时间演变。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验