Emergency Medicine Program, Department of Surgery and Perioperative Care, Dell Medical School at the University of Texas-Austin, Austin, TX, United States of America.
Emergency Medicine Program, Department of Surgery and Perioperative Care, Dell Medical School at the University of Texas-Austin, Austin, TX, United States of America.
Am J Emerg Med. 2019 Sep;37(9):1729-1733. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.12.031. Epub 2018 Dec 18.
To evaluate changes in insurance status among emergency department (ED) patients presenting in the two years immediately before and after full implementation of the Affordable Care Act (ACA).
We evaluated National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS) Emergency Department public use data for 2012-2015, categorizing patients as having any insurance (private; Medicare; Medicaid; workers' compensation) or no insurance. We compared the pre- and post-ACA frequency of insurance coverage-overall and within the older (≥65), working-age (18-64) and pediatric (<18) subpopulations-using unadjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals. We also conducted a difference-in-differences analysis comparing the change in insurance coverage among working-age patients with that observed for older Medicare-eligible patients, while controlling for sex, race and underlying temporal trends.
Overall, the proportion of ED patients with any insurance did not significantly change from 2012 to 2013 to 2014-2015 (74.2% vs 77.7%) but the proportion of working-age adult patients with at least one form of insurance increased significantly, from 66.0% to 71.8% (OR 1.31, CI: 1.13-1.52). The difference-in-differences analysis confirmed the change in insurance coverage among working-age adults was greater than that seen in the reference population of Medicare-eligible adults (AOR 1.70, CI: 1.29-2.23). The increase was almost entirely attributable to increased Medicaid coverage.
In the first two years following full implementation of the ACA, there was a significant increase in the proportion of working-age adult ED patients who had at least one form of health insurance. The increase appeared primarily associated with expansion of Medicaid.
评估平价医疗法案(ACA)全面实施前后两年内,急诊科(ED)就诊患者的保险状况变化。
我们评估了 2012-2015 年全国医院门诊医疗调查(NHAMCS)ED 公共使用数据,将患者分为有任何保险(私人;医疗保险;医疗补助;工人补偿)或无保险。我们比较了 ACA 实施前后各年龄段(≥65 岁、18-64 岁和<18 岁)保险覆盖的总体情况和变化,使用未经调整的优势比(95%置信区间)进行比较。我们还进行了差异分析,比较了 18-64 岁工作年龄患者的保险覆盖变化与 Medicare 合格患者观察到的变化,同时控制了性别、种族和潜在的时间趋势。
总体而言,ED 患者有任何保险的比例从 2012 年到 2013 年到 2014-2015 年没有显著变化(74.2%对 77.7%),但至少有一种保险的工作年龄成年患者比例显著增加,从 66.0%增加到 71.8%(OR 1.31,CI:1.13-1.52)。差异分析证实,工作年龄成年人的保险覆盖变化大于 Medicare 合格成年人的参考人群(AOR 1.70,CI:1.29-2.23)。这种增加几乎完全归因于医疗补助覆盖范围的扩大。
在 ACA 全面实施后的头两年,至少有一种健康保险的工作年龄成年 ED 患者比例显著增加。这种增加似乎主要与医疗补助的扩大有关。