Nichols Jason J, Chalmers Robin L, Dumbleton Kathy, Jones Lyndon, Lievens Christopher W, Merchea Mohinder M, Szczotka-Flynn Loretta
Office of the Vice President for Research (J.J.N.), The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; School of Optometry (J.J.N.), The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL; Clinical Trial Consultant (R.L.C.), Atlanta, GA; School of Optometry (K.D.) University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA; Clinical Research Scientist and Consultant (K.D.), Berkeley, CA; School of Optometry and Vision Science (L.J.), University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada; Centre for Ocular Research & Education (L.J.), University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada; Internal Clinics (C.W.L.), The Eye Center, Southern College of Optometry, Memphis, TN; Clinical Development & Medical Affairs, North America (M.M.M.), Alcon, a Novartis Company, Fort Worth, TX; Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences (L.S.-F.), Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; and Contact Lens Service (L.S.-F.), University Hospitals Eye Institute, Cleveland, OH.
Eye Contact Lens. 2019 Mar;45(2):69-82. doi: 10.1097/ICL.0000000000000542.
Despite their established disinfection and safety benefits, the use of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) lens care systems among today's wearers of reusable contact lenses remains low in comparison with multipurpose solution (MPS) use. Multipurpose solution systems, however, present several potential drawbacks that may impact patient outcomes, including the use of chemical preservatives for disinfection, biocompatibility issues, and challenges with respect to lens care compliance. Given their unique composition and mechanism of action, one-step H2O2 systems offer the opportunity to avoid many of the challenges associated with MPS use. This article reviews the evolution of H2O2 lens care systems and examines the current scientific and clinical evidence regarding the relative ease of use, lens and tissue compatibility, disinfection efficacy, and ocular surface safety of H2O2 systems. Evaluation of the available data indicates that in comparison with MPS, one-step H2O2 systems tend to promote more favorable compliance, efficacy, comfort, and ocular surface outcomes for a wide range of contact lens-wearing patients. Based on the current published evidence, the authors recommend that eye care practitioners consider making one-step H2O2 systems their first-line contact lens care recommendation for most wearers of reusable lenses.
尽管过氧化氢(H₂O₂)镜片护理系统具有已确立的消毒和安全优势,但与多用途护理液(MPS)的使用相比,如今可重复使用隐形眼镜佩戴者中H₂O₂镜片护理系统的使用比例仍然较低。然而,多用途护理液系统存在几个可能影响患者使用效果的潜在缺点,包括使用化学防腐剂进行消毒、生物相容性问题以及镜片护理依从性方面的挑战。鉴于其独特的成分和作用机制,一步式H₂O₂系统提供了避免许多与使用MPS相关挑战的机会。本文回顾了H₂O₂镜片护理系统的发展历程,并研究了当前关于H₂O₂系统相对易用性、镜片与组织相容性、消毒效果以及眼表安全性的科学和临床证据。对现有数据的评估表明,与MPS相比,一步式H₂O₂系统往往能为广泛的隐形眼镜佩戴患者带来更有利的依从性、效果、舒适度和眼表使用效果。基于当前已发表的证据,作者建议眼科护理从业者考虑将一步式H₂O₂系统作为大多数可重复使用镜片佩戴者的一线隐形眼镜护理推荐产品。