Suppr超能文献

肉毒杆菌毒素与安慰剂:偏头痛预防性治疗的荟萃分析。

Botulinum Toxin versus Placebo: A Meta-Analysis of Prophylactic Treatment for Migraine.

机构信息

From the Department of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, University Hospital of Picardie, Amiens Picardie University Hospital; the Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, CHRU Rangueil; and the Department of Epidemiology, Health Economics and Public Health, UMR1027 INSERM-Université de Toulouse III, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse.

出版信息

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 Jan;143(1):239-250. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005111.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of botulinum toxin in reducing the frequency of migraine headaches.

METHODS

The MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched to identify randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials that compared patients receiving botulinum toxin versus placebo injections in the head and neck muscles, for the preventive treatment of migraine. The primary outcome was change in the number of headache episodes per month from baseline to 3 months.

RESULTS

There were 17 studies including a total of 3646 patients. Overall analysis reported a tendency in favor of botulinum toxin over placebo at 3 months, with a mean difference in the change of migraine frequency of -0.23 (95 percent CI, -0.47 to 0.02; p = 0.08). The reduction in frequency of chronic migraines was significant, with a mean differential change of -1.56 (95 percent CI, -3.05 to -0.07; p = 0.04). Analysis of chronic migraine frequency was also significant after 2 months. The findings also highlighted an improvement of the patient's quality of life at 3 months in the botulinum toxin group (p < 0.00001). Further adverse events were traced in the botulinum toxin type A group with a statistically significant risk ratio of 1.32 (p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis reveals that botulinum toxin type A injections are superior to placebo for chronic migraines after 3 months of therapy. For the first time, a real benefit in patient quality of life is demonstrated with only few and mild adverse events.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, II.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在评估肉毒毒素在减少偏头痛发作频率方面的疗效。

方法

检索 MEDLINE、Embase 和 Cochrane 图书馆数据库,以确定比较患者在头部和颈部肌肉中接受肉毒毒素与安慰剂注射的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验,用于偏头痛的预防性治疗。主要结局是从基线到 3 个月每月头痛发作次数的变化。

结果

有 17 项研究共纳入 3646 名患者。总体分析显示,在 3 个月时,肉毒毒素组倾向于优于安慰剂组,偏头痛频率变化的平均差异为-0.23(95%CI,-0.47 至 0.02;p = 0.08)。慢性偏头痛的频率降低具有统计学意义,平均差异变化为-1.56(95%CI,-3.05 至-0.07;p = 0.04)。2 个月时慢性偏头痛频率的分析也具有统计学意义。研究结果还强调了在 3 个月时肉毒毒素组患者生活质量的改善(p<0.00001)。肉毒毒素 A 组还追踪到更多的不良事件,其统计学显著风险比为 1.32(p = 0.002)。

结论

这项荟萃分析表明,在 3 个月的治疗后,肉毒毒素 A 注射在慢性偏头痛方面优于安慰剂。首次证明了患者生活质量的真正获益,且仅有少数轻微的不良事件。

临床问题/证据水平:治疗性,II 级。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验