Institute of Global Health, Medical Faculty and University Hospital, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston MA, United States of America.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018 Dec 27;12(12):e0007002. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007002. eCollection 2018 Dec.
Neglected tropical diseases (NTDs) account for a large disease burden in sub-Saharan Africa. While the general cost-effectiveness of NTD interventions to improve health outcomes has been assessed, few studies have also accounted for the financial and education gains of investing in NTD control.
We built on extended cost-effectiveness analysis (ECEA) methods to assess the health gains (e.g. infections, disability-adjusted life years or DALYs averted), household financial gains (out-of-pocket expenditures averted), and education gains (cases of school absenteeism averted) for five NTD interventions that the government of Madagascar aims to roll out nationally. The five NTDs considered were schistosomiasis, lymphatic filariasis, and three soil-transmitted helminthiases (Ascaris lumbricoides, Trichuris trichiura, and hookworm infections).
The estimated incremental cost-effectiveness for the roll-out of preventive chemotherapy for all NTDs jointly was USD125 per DALY averted (95% uncertainty range: 65-231), and its benefit-cost ratio could vary between 5 and 31. Our analysis estimated that, per dollar spent, schistosomiasis preventive chemotherapy, in particular, could avert a large number of infections (176,000 infections averted per $100,000 spent), DALYs (2,000 averted per $100,000 spent), and cases of school absenteeism (27,000 school years gained per $100,000 spent).
This analysis incorporates financial and education gains into the economic evaluation of health interventions, and therefore provides information about the efficiency of attainment of three Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Our findings reveal how the national scale-up of NTD control in Madagascar can help address health (SDG3), economic (SDG1), and education (SDG4) goals. This study further highlights the potentially large societal benefits of investing in NTD control in low-resource settings.
在撒哈拉以南非洲,被忽视的热带病(NTDs)造成了很大的疾病负担。虽然已经评估了改善健康结果的 NTD 干预措施的总体成本效益,但很少有研究也考虑到投资 NTD 控制的财务和教育收益。
我们基于扩展成本效益分析(ECEA)方法,评估了马达加斯加政府旨在在全国范围内推出的五项 NTD 干预措施的健康收益(例如,感染、残疾调整生命年或避免的 DALYs)、家庭财务收益(避免的自付支出)和教育收益(避免的学校缺勤)。考虑的五种 NTD 分别是血吸虫病、淋巴丝虫病和三种土壤传播的蠕虫病(蛔虫、鞭虫和钩虫感染)。
联合开展所有 NTD 预防性化疗的估计增量成本效益为每避免一个 DALY 花费 125 美元(95%不确定性范围:65-231 美元),其效益成本比可能在 5 到 31 之间变化。我们的分析估计,每花费一美元,特别是血吸虫病预防性化疗可以避免大量感染(每花费 10 万美元可避免 176,000 例感染)、DALYs(每花费 10 万美元可避免 2,000 例)和学校缺勤(每花费 10 万美元可获得 27,000 个学年)。
这项分析将财务和教育收益纳入健康干预措施的经济评估中,因此提供了关于实现三个可持续发展目标(SDGs)的效率的信息。我们的研究结果揭示了马达加斯加全国范围内扩大 NTD 控制范围如何有助于实现健康(SDG3)、经济(SDG1)和教育(SDG4)目标。这项研究进一步强调了在资源匮乏的环境中投资 NTD 控制可能带来的巨大社会效益。