Telleman Johan A, Herraets Ingrid J T, Goedee H Stephan, Verhamme Camiel, Nikolakopoulos Stavros, van Asseldonk Jan-Thies H, van der Pol W Ludo, van den Berg Leonard H, Visser Leo H
From the Department of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology (J.A.T., I.J.T.H., J.-T.H.v.A., L.H.V.), Elisabeth-Tweesteden Hospital, Tilburg; Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery (J.A.T., I.J.T.H., H.S.G., W.L.v.d.P., L.H.v.d.B.), Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, UMC Utrecht; Department of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology (C.V.), Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam; and Department of Biostatistics (S.N.), Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, UMC Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Neurology. 2019 Jan 28;92(5):e443-e450. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000006856.
To determine interobserver variability of nerve ultrasound in peripheral neuropathy in a prospective, systematic, multicenter study.
We enrolled 20 patients with an acquired chronic demyelinating or axonal polyneuropathy and 10 healthy controls in 3 different centers. All participants underwent an extensive nerve ultrasound protocol, including cross-sectional area measurements of median, ulnar, fibular, tibial, and sural nerves, and brachial plexus. Real-time image acquisition was performed blind by a local and a visiting investigator (reference). Five patients were investigated using different types of sonographic devices. Intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated, and a random-effects model was fitted to identify factors with significant effect on interobserver variability.
Systematic differences between measurements made by different investigators were small (mean difference 0.11 mm [95% confidence interval 0.00-0.23 mm]). Intraclass correlation coefficients were generally higher in arm nerves (0.48-0.96) than leg nerves (0.46-0.61). The hospital site and sonographic device did not contribute significantly to interobserver variability in the random-effects model.
Interobserver variability of nerve ultrasound in peripheral neuropathy is generally limited, especially in arm nerves. Different devices and a multicenter setting have no effect on interobserver variability. Therefore, nerve ultrasound is a reproducible tool for diagnostics in routine clinical practice and (multicenter) research.
在一项前瞻性、系统性、多中心研究中确定神经超声在外周神经病变中的观察者间变异性。
我们在3个不同中心招募了20例获得性慢性脱髓鞘或轴索性多发性神经病患者和10名健康对照者。所有参与者均接受了广泛的神经超声检查方案,包括对正中神经、尺神经、腓总神经、胫神经和腓肠神经以及臂丛神经的横截面积测量。由当地研究者和来访研究者(参考)在不知情的情况下进行实时图像采集。使用不同类型超声设备对5例患者进行了检查。计算组内相关系数,并拟合随机效应模型以识别对观察者间变异性有显著影响的因素。
不同研究者测量结果之间的系统差异较小(平均差异0.11mm [95%置信区间0.00 - 0.23mm])。臂神经的组内相关系数一般高于腿神经(0.48 - 0.96比0.46 - 0.61)。在随机效应模型中,医院地点和超声设备对观察者间变异性的影响不显著。
神经超声在外周神经病变中的观察者间变异性一般有限,尤其是在臂神经中。不同设备和多中心环境对观察者间变异性无影响。因此,神经超声是常规临床实践和(多中心)研究中一种可重复的诊断工具。