Suppr超能文献

粉末(林奈)和(林奈叶糊剂)在治疗(湿疹)中的临床评估

Clinical evaluation of powder ( Linn.) and (paste of leaves of Linn.) in the management of (eczema).

作者信息

Talekar Manisha T, Mandal Sisir Kumar, Sharma Reetu R

机构信息

Department of Roganidana Evam Vikriti Vijanana, National Institute of Ayurveda, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.

出版信息

Ayu. 2018 Jan-Mar;39(1):9-15. doi: 10.4103/ayu.AYU_45_15.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In , majority of skin diseases have been mentioned under the umbrella of and in other words, it can be listed as " dermatology." Among them, (eczema) included under , has been mentioned as curable disease, but due to relapsing nature of the disease and hazardous side effects of the modern drugs, it is difficult to manage. classics described a number of formulations to combat (skin diseases) which offers effective remedy for eczema. Therefore, the attempt was done to assess the effect of (regular purgation) along with local application in its management.

AIM AND OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of powder along with (paste) and (paste) alone as local application in the management of (eczema).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 63 patients of (eczema) were selected and allocated in 2 groups, out of which 60 patients (30 patients each) completed the trial treatment. Group A received powder ( Linn.) along with local application of paste of leaves of ( Linn.) and group B received local application of (paste) for the duration of 4 weeks.

RESULTS

All calculations were calculated through 'Graph Pad In Stat 3' software. (regular purgation) by along with (group A) proved more effective to control itching, discharge, burning sensation, eruption, discoloration, pain and edema of cases of .

CONCLUSION

Treatment with ( Linn.) along with local application of paste of is effective in reducing the symptoms of (eczema).

摘要

背景

在[具体内容缺失]中,大多数皮肤病都被归入[具体分类缺失]的范畴,换句话说,它可以列为“[具体皮肤病学相关名称缺失]皮肤病学”。其中,归入[具体分类缺失]的[疾病名称缺失](湿疹)被提及为可治愈的疾病,但由于该疾病的复发性以及现代药物的有害副作用,其治疗难度较大。[医学经典名称缺失]描述了许多用于对抗[皮肤病相关名称缺失](皮肤病)的配方,这些配方为湿疹提供了有效的治疗方法。因此,本研究尝试评估[具体治疗方法名称缺失](定期泻下)联合局部用药在湿疹治疗中的效果。

目的

本研究的目的是比较[具体药物名称缺失]粉末联合[具体药物名称缺失](糊剂)和单独使用[具体药物名称缺失](糊剂)作为局部用药治疗[疾病名称缺失](湿疹)的疗效。

材料与方法

共选取63例[疾病名称缺失](湿疹)患者并分为2组,其中60例患者(每组30例)完成了试验治疗。A组接受[具体药物名称缺失]粉末([植物学名缺失])联合[具体植物名称缺失]([植物学名缺失])叶糊剂局部应用,B组在4周内仅接受[具体药物名称缺失](糊剂)局部应用。

结果

所有计算均通过“Graph Pad In Stat 3”软件完成。[具体治疗方法名称缺失](定期泻下)联合[具体药物名称缺失](A组)在控制[疾病名称缺失]患者的瘙痒、渗出、烧灼感、皮疹、色素沉着、疼痛和水肿方面被证明更有效。

结论

[具体植物名称缺失]([植物学名缺失])联合[具体植物名称缺失]糊剂局部应用治疗[疾病名称缺失](湿疹)可有效减轻症状。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4aba/6287402/a23a749c0a99/AYU-39-9-g002.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验