Peters Ellen
The Ohio State University.
Behav Public Policy. 2017 Nov;1(2):162-176. doi: 10.1017/bpp.2016.15. Epub 2017 Oct 6.
Can we educate decision makers to make better decisions? In the present paper, I argue that we can in at least two broad ways: (1) teaching concrete knowledge about a specific decision or decision type and (2) teaching more abstract decision-making competencies thought to lead to better decisions. Teaching knowledge can be done using decision aids and similar techniques that provide important information about a specific choice (e.g., a medical treatment option). In these cases, information presented using evidence-based techniques to improve comprehension and use of information will have greater effects on judgments and choices. Teaching more abstract decision competencies, on the other hand, involves formal schooling (with the bulk of formal education falling during childhood) or training in a specific competency important to decision processes and outcomes; I use numeracy interventions as an exemplar.
我们能否教育决策者做出更好的决策?在本文中,我认为我们至少可以通过两种广泛的方式做到这一点:(1)教授关于特定决策或决策类型的具体知识,以及(2)教授更抽象的决策能力,这些能力被认为能带来更好的决策。教授知识可以通过决策辅助工具和类似技术来实现,这些技术能提供关于特定选择(例如医疗治疗方案)的重要信息。在这些情况下,使用基于证据的技术呈现信息以提高对信息的理解和运用,将对判断和选择产生更大影响。另一方面,教授更抽象的决策能力涉及正规学校教育(大部分正规教育在童年时期进行)或针对对决策过程和结果至关重要的特定能力的培训;我以算术干预为例。