Suppr超能文献

与私人保险个体相比,医疗补助受益人的ST段抬高型心肌梗死院内管理及预后

In-Hospital Management and Outcomes After ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction in Medicaid Beneficiaries Compared With Privately Insured Individuals.

作者信息

Patel Nirav, Gupta Ankur, Doshi Rajkumar, Kalra Rajat, Bajaj Navkaranbir S, Arora Garima, Arora Pankaj

机构信息

Division of Cardiovascular Disease, University of Alabama at Birmingham Birmingham, AL (N.P., N.S.B., G.A., P.A.).

Cardiovascular Division, Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (A.G., N.S.B.).

出版信息

Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2019 Jan;12(1):e004971. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.118.004971.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Medicaid expansion among previously uninsured individuals has led to improved healthcare access. However, considerably lower reimbursement rates of Medicaid have raised concerns on the unintended consequence of lower utilization of life-saving therapies and inferior outcomes compared with private insurance. We examined the rates of revascularization and in-hospital mortality among Medicaid beneficiaries versus privately insured individuals hospitalized with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).

METHODS AND RESULTS

We queried the National Inpatient Sample from 2012 to 2015 for STEMI hospitalizations with Medicaid or private insurance as primary payer. Hospitalizations with the following criteria were excluded: (1) age <18 or ≥65 years, (2) transfer to another acute care facility, and (3) left against medical advice. Outcomes were compared in propensity score-matched cohort based on demographics, socioeconomic status (income based), clinical comorbidities, including drug and alcohol use, STEMI acuity (cardiac arrest and cardiogenic shock), and hospital characteristics. A total of 42 645 and 171 545 STEMI hospitalizations were identified as having Medicaid and private insurance, respectively. In unadjusted analyses, Medicaid beneficiaries with STEMI had lower rates of coronary revascularization (88.9% versus 92.3%; odds ratio, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.65-0.70) and higher rates of in-hospital mortality (4.9% versus 2.8%; odds ratio, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.72-1.91) compared with privately insured individuals ( P<0.001 for both). In propensity-matched cohort of 40 870 hospitalizations per group, similar results for lower rates of revascularization (89.1% versus 91.1%; odds ratio, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.76-0.84) and higher in-hospital mortality (4.9% versus 3.7%; odds ratio, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.26-1.45) were observed in Medicaid compared with private insurance, despite extensive matching ( P<0.001 for both).

CONCLUSIONS

Medicaid beneficiaries with STEMI had lower rates of revascularization, although small absolute difference, and higher in-hospital mortality compared with privately insured individuals. Further studies are needed to identify and understand the variation in STEMI outcomes by insurance status.

摘要

背景

先前未参保人群的医疗补助计划(Medicaid)扩大导致医疗服务可及性得到改善。然而,Medicaid的报销率显著低于私人保险,这引发了人们对其可能导致与私人保险相比挽救生命疗法的使用率降低以及治疗效果较差这一意外后果的担忧。我们研究了因ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)住院的Medicaid受益人与私人保险参保者的血管重建率和住院死亡率。

方法与结果

我们查询了2012年至2015年全国住院患者样本中以Medicaid或私人保险作为主要支付方的STEMI住院病例。排除符合以下标准的住院病例:(1)年龄<18岁或≥65岁;(2)转至另一家急性护理机构;(3)违反医嘱擅自离院。基于人口统计学、社会经济状况(收入)、临床合并症(包括药物和酒精使用情况)、STEMI严重程度(心脏骤停和心源性休克)以及医院特征,在倾向得分匹配队列中比较结果。共确定42645例和171545例STEMI住院病例分别有Medicaid和私人保险。在未经调整的分析中,与私人保险参保者相比,患有STEMI的Medicaid受益人冠状动脉血管重建率较低(88.9%对92.3%;优势比,0.67;95%CI,0.65 - 0.70),住院死亡率较高(4.9%对2.8%;优势比,1.81;95%CI,1.72 - 1.91)(两者P<0.001)。在每组40870例住院病例的倾向匹配队列中,与私人保险相比,Medicaid的血管重建率较低(89.1%对91.1%;优势比,0.80;95%CI,0.76 - 0.84)和住院死亡率较高(4.9%对3.7%;优势比,1.35;95%CI,1.26 - 1.45)的情况依然存在,尽管进行了广泛匹配(两者P<0.001)。

结论

患有STEMI的Medicaid受益人血管重建率较低,尽管绝对差异较小,且与私人保险参保者相比住院死亡率较高。需要进一步研究以确定并理解不同保险状况下STEMI治疗结果的差异。

相似文献

6
Influence of primary payer status on the management and outcomes of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in the United States.
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 18;15(12):e0243810. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243810. eCollection 2020.
8
Management and Outcomes of Acute Myocardial Infarction-Cardiogenic Shock in Uninsured Compared With Privately Insured Individuals.
Circ Heart Fail. 2022 May;15(5):e008991. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.121.008991. Epub 2022 Mar 4.
9
10
Impact of medicaid expansion on disparities in revascularization in patients hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction.
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 23;15(12):e0243385. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243385. eCollection 2020.

引用本文的文献

1
Social Determinants of Health and 30-Day Readmission After Acute Myocardial Infarction in the REGARDS Study.
JACC Adv. 2025 Mar;4(3):101584. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2025.101584. Epub 2025 Feb 13.
4
Relationship Between Insurance Status and Receipt of Cardiac Tests and Procedures During Hospitalization: A Cross-Sectional Study.
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Oct;13(19):e035797. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.035797. Epub 2024 Sep 30.
5
Structural Inequities In The Adoption Of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Services By US Hospitals, 2000-20.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2024 Jul;43(7):1011-1020. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2023.01649.
9
Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2023 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association.
Circulation. 2023 Feb 21;147(8):e93-e621. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001123. Epub 2023 Jan 25.

本文引用的文献

3
Adherence to Methodological Standards in Research Using the National Inpatient Sample.
JAMA. 2017 Nov 28;318(20):2011-2018. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.17653.
5
Association Between Health Insurance Status and In-Hospital Outcomes After ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.
Am J Cardiol. 2017 Oct 1;120(7):1049-1054. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.06.041. Epub 2017 Jul 17.
6
Health and Access to Care during the First 2 Years of the ACA Medicaid Expansions.
N Engl J Med. 2017 Mar 9;376(10):947-956. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1612890.
8
The Growing Difference Between Public And Private Payment Rates For Inpatient Hospital Care.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2015 Dec;34(12):2147-50. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.0706.
9
The REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely-collected health Data (RECORD) statement.
PLoS Med. 2015 Oct 6;12(10):e1001885. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001885. eCollection 2015 Oct.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验