Department of Reinforced Concrete Structures and Geotechnics, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Sauletekio ave. 11, LT-10223 Vilnius, Lithuania.
Research Laboratory of Innovative Building Structures, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Sauletekio ave. 11, LT-10223 Vilnius, Lithuania.
Sensors (Basel). 2019 Jan 7;19(1):200. doi: 10.3390/s19010200.
Experimental and numerical studies have been carried out on reinforced concrete (RC) short tensile specimens. Double pull-out tests employed rectangular RC elements of a length determined not to yield any additional primary cracks. Tests were carried out with tensor strain gauges installed within a specially modified reinforcement bar and, alternatively, with fibre Bragg grating based optical sensors. The aim of this paper is to analyse the different experimental setups regarding obtaining more accurate and reliable reinforcement strain distribution data. Furthermore, reinforcement strain profiles obtained numerically using the stress transfer approach and the Model Code 2010 provided bond-slip model were compared against the experimental results. Accurate knowledge of the relation between the concrete and the embedded reinforcement is necessary and lacking to this day for less scattered and reliable prediction of cracking behaviour of RC elements. The presented experimental strain values enable future research on bond interaction. In addition, few double pull-out test results are published when compared to ordinary bond tests of single pull-out tests with embedded reinforcement. The authors summarize the comparison with observations on experimental setups and discuss the findings.
已经对钢筋混凝土(RC)短拉伸试件进行了实验和数值研究。双拔出试验采用长度确定不会产生任何额外初始裂缝的矩形 RC 元件。试验是在经过特殊改装的钢筋内安装张量应变计进行的,或者使用基于光纤布拉格光栅的光学传感器进行。本文的目的是分析不同的实验设置,以获得更准确和可靠的钢筋应变分布数据。此外,使用应力传递方法和《模型规范 2010》提供的粘结滑移模型获得的钢筋应变分布数值结果与实验结果进行了比较。准确了解混凝土和嵌入钢筋之间的关系是必要的,但至今仍缺乏对 RC 构件开裂行为进行更离散和可靠预测的知识。所提出的实验应变值可用于未来对粘结相互作用的研究。此外,与普通单拉试验中的嵌入钢筋的粘结试验相比,双拉试验的试验结果发表的很少。作者总结了对实验设置的比较,并讨论了研究结果。