Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada.
Department of Medicine, Centre for Medical Education, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Perspect Med Educ. 2019 Feb;8(1):43-46. doi: 10.1007/s40037-018-0491-0.
PhD-trained researchers working in health professions education (HPE) regularly engage in one-on-one, or one-on-few, scholarly mentorship activities. While this work is often a formal expectation of these scientists' roles, rarely is there formal institutional acknowledgement of this mentorship. In fact, there are few official means through which a research scientist can document the frequency or quality of the scholarly mentorship they provide.
OUTCOMES: The STHPE assessment tool has appropriate psychometric properties and evidence supporting acceptability. It can be used to document areas of strength and areas for improvement for research scientists engaged in HPE-related scholarly mentorship.
At present, the STHPE assessment tool is the only formally developed tool for which there is evidence of validity for use by PhD-trained researchers working in HPE to collect feedback on their scholarly mentorship skills. The STPHE has been used in promotion and tenure packages to document effectiveness and quality of scholarly mentorship.
在健康职业教育(HPE)领域工作的受过博士培训的研究人员经常进行一对一或一对少数人的学术指导活动。虽然这项工作通常是这些科学家角色的正式要求,但很少有正式的机构承认这种指导关系。事实上,研究科学家很少有正式的途径可以记录他们提供的学术指导的频率或质量。
结果:STHPE 评估工具具有适当的心理测量学特性和可接受性的证据支持。它可用于记录从事 HPE 相关学术指导的研究科学家的优势领域和改进领域。
目前,STHPE 评估工具是唯一经过正式开发的工具,有证据表明在 HPE 领域工作的受过博士培训的研究人员可以使用该工具来收集关于他们学术指导技能的反馈。STPHE 已被用于晋升和终身教职套餐中,以记录学术指导的效果和质量。