Suppr超能文献

葡萄牙当地渔民对人工鱼礁生态系统服务有用性的认知。

Local fishermen's perceptions of the usefulness of artificial reef ecosystem services in Portugal.

作者信息

Ramos Jorge, Lino Pedro G, Himes-Cornell Amber, Santos Miguel N

机构信息

IPMA-Portuguese Institute for the Ocean and Atmosphere, I.P., Lisbon, Portugal.

MARE-Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre, ESTM, Instituto Politécnico de Leiria, Peniche, Portugal.

出版信息

PeerJ. 2019 Jan 11;6:e6206. doi: 10.7717/peerj.6206. eCollection 2019.

Abstract

Proponents of artificial reef (AR) deployment are often motivated by the usefulness of such structures. The usefulness of ARs is related to their capability of providing ecosystem services/additional functions. We present two distinct Portuguese AR case studies: (1) The Nazaré reef off the central coast of Portugal and (2) the Oura reef off the Algarve coast. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with local fishermen in the fishing towns of Nazaré and Quarteira pre-and post-AR deployment. The main focus of the interviews was to understand fishermen's perception of AR usefulness (or lack thereof) in terms of nine ecosystem services/additional functions potentially provided by the ARs. We tested the null hypothesis that ARs do not provide additional ecosystem services/additional functions. When queried pre-AR deployment, fishermen indicated that ARs are most likely to provide three ecosystem services: "habitat and refuge," "biodiversity preservation" and "food production." Fishermen had similar perceptions post-deployment. For the Nazaré reef, fishermen tended to have a positive or neutral perception of ecosystem services/additional functions being provided by ARs. For the Oura reef, fishermen tended to have a mostly neutral perception of AR ecosystem services; however, there were also some positive and other negative perceptions. It was difficult for stakeholders to conceptualize some of the ecosystem services/additional functions provided by ARs prior to actively using them. As a result, some stakeholders changed their perception of the ecosystem services/additional functions after using the structures. These results indicate that stakeholders likely need to perceive ARs as useful in order for them to provide their support for AR installation. Likewise, their support is often needed to justify the use of public funds to install ARs, therefore making it imperative for resource managers to undertake similar interviews with fishermen when considering the use of ARs in other areas.

摘要

人工鱼礁(AR)部署的支持者往往是受此类结构的实用性所驱动。人工鱼礁的实用性与其提供生态系统服务/附加功能的能力相关。我们展示了两个不同的葡萄牙人工鱼礁案例研究:(1)葡萄牙中部海岸外的纳扎雷礁和(2)阿尔加维海岸外的奥拉礁。在人工鱼礁部署前后,对纳扎雷和夸尔泰拉渔村的当地渔民进行了半结构化访谈。访谈的主要重点是了解渔民对人工鱼礁在九种潜在生态系统服务/附加功能方面实用性的看法(或缺乏实用性的看法)。我们检验了人工鱼礁不提供额外生态系统服务/附加功能的零假设。在人工鱼礁部署前进行询问时,渔民表示人工鱼礁最有可能提供三种生态系统服务:“栖息地和避难所”、“生物多样性保护”和“食物生产”。部署后渔民的看法类似。对于纳扎雷礁,渔民对人工鱼礁提供的生态系统服务/附加功能往往持积极或中立的看法。对于奥拉礁,渔民对人工鱼礁的生态系统服务大多持中立看法;然而,也有一些积极和其他消极的看法。在积极使用人工鱼礁之前,利益相关者很难概念化其提供的一些生态系统服务/附加功能。因此,一些利益相关者在使用这些结构后改变了他们对生态系统服务/附加功能的看法。这些结果表明,利益相关者可能需要认为人工鱼礁有用,以便他们支持人工鱼礁的安装。同样,通常也需要他们的支持来证明使用公共资金安装人工鱼礁的合理性,因此资源管理者在考虑在其他地区使用人工鱼礁时,必须对渔民进行类似的访谈。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/93b7/6330946/937e10902151/peerj-07-6206-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验