University of Chicago Internal Medicine Residency Program, Chicago, IL.
University of California San Francisco Fresno Emergency Medicine Residency Program, Fresno, CA.
Acad Emerg Med. 2019 Feb;26(2):129-139. doi: 10.1111/acem.13494. Epub 2019 Jan 16.
While improved access to safety net primary care providers, like federally qualified health centers (FQHCs), is often cited as a route to alleviate potentially preventable emergency department (ED) visits, no studies have longitudinally established the impact of improving access to FQHCs on ED use among Medicaid-insured and uninsured adults. We aimed to determine whether improved access to FQHCs was associated with lower ED use by uninsured and Medicaid-insured adults.
Using data from the Uniform Data System, U.S. Census Bureau, and California Office of Statewide Health Planning & Development, we conducted a longitudinal analysis of 58 California counties from 2005 to 2013. For each county-year observation, we employed three measures of FQHC access: geographic density of FQHCs (delivery sites per 100 square miles), FQHCs per county resident (delivery sites per 100,000 county residents), and the proportion of Medicaid-insured or uninsured residents ages 19 to 64 years that utilized FQHCs. We then used a fixed-effects model to examine the impact of changes in the measures of FQHC access on ED visit rates by Medicaid-insured or uninsured adults in each county.
Increasing geographic density of FQHCs was associated with a 26% to 35% decrease in ED use by uninsured but not Medicaid-insured patients. Increasing numbers of clinics per county resident and higher percentages of Medicaid-insured and uninsured adults seen at FQHCs were not associated with reduced rates of ED use among either uninsured or Medicaid-insured adults.
We were unable to detect a consistent association between our measures of FQHC access and ED use by Medicaid-insured and uninsured nonelderly California adults, underscoring the importance of investigating additional drivers to reduce ED use among these vulnerable patient populations.
改善获得安全网初级保健提供者(如联邦合格的健康中心[FQHC])的途径通常被认为是减轻潜在可预防的急诊部(ED)就诊的途径,但没有研究从纵向角度确定改善获得 FQHC 的途径是否会对未参保和参加医疗补助的成年人对 ED 的使用产生影响。我们旨在确定改善获得 FQHC 的途径是否与未参保和参加医疗补助的成年人对 ED 的使用减少相关。
我们使用来自美国人口普查局的统一数据系统和加利福尼亚州全州卫生规划与发展办公室的数据,对 2005 年至 2013 年的加利福尼亚州 58 个县进行了纵向分析。对于每一个县年观察,我们采用了三种 FQHC 获得途径的衡量标准:FQHC 的地理密度(每 100 平方英里的交付点)、每县居民的 FQHC 数量(每 10 万县居民的交付点)以及 19 至 64 岁的 Medicaid 参保或未参保居民中利用 FQHC 的比例。然后,我们使用固定效应模型来检查 FQHC 获得途径的措施变化对每个县未参保或参保成年人 ED 就诊率的影响。
FQHC 地理密度的增加与未参保患者 ED 使用量减少 26%至 35%相关,但与参保患者无关。每县居民的诊所数量增加和 Medicaid 参保和未参保成年人在 FQHC 就诊的比例增加与未参保或参保成年人的 ED 使用率降低无关。
我们无法检测到我们的 FQHC 获得途径的衡量标准与加利福尼亚州非老年未参保和参保成年人的 ED 使用之间存在一致的关联,这凸显了调查减少这些弱势群体患者群体对 ED 使用的其他驱动因素的重要性。