Cao Huihua, Tang Zhaoqing, Yu Zhan, Wang Qing, Li Zhong, Lu Qicheng, Wu Yugang
Department of General Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University (The First People's Hospital of Changzhou), Changzhou, Jiangsu 213000, P.R. China.
Department of General Surgery, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, P.R. China.
Oncol Lett. 2019 Jan;17(1):1299-1305. doi: 10.3892/ol.2018.9694. Epub 2018 Nov 13.
The log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS) and the metastatic lymph node ratio (MLR) staging systems have previously been demonstrated to exhibit advantages compared with the tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging system in predicting the prognosis of gastric cancer. The current study compared the prognostic significance of the newest Union for International Cancer Control Node classification with the LODDS and MLR staging systems. From September 2010 to December 2012, all medical records for patients with gastric cancer at the Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University were retrospectively analyzed and the clinicopathologic characteristics were reviewed. Cut-off points were selected to divide the patients with gastric cancer into different groups. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify the prognostic risk factors for gastric cancer. The Harrell's concordance index (C-index) was adopted to compare the prognostic value of the three staging systems. A total of 877 patients with gastric cancer who met the inclusion criteria were analyzed in the current study. The patients were classified according to the three MLR subgroups as follows: MLR0 (MLR=0), MLR1 (0<MLR≤0.28) and MLR2 (0.28<MLR<1). The patients were classified according to the LODDS subgroups as follows: LODDS1 (LODDS≤-0.5), LODDS2 (-0.5<LODDS≤0), LODDS3 (0<LODDS≤0.5) and LODDS4 (LODDS>0.5). Based on multivariate analysis, LODDS, MLR and pathological node (pN) stage could significantly predict survival rates of patients with gastric cancer. According to the C-index, the LODDS staging system more accurately predicted the 5-year overall survival for patients with gastric cancer compared with the other two staging systems. In summary, the current study has identified that LODDS may be superior to the MLR and pN staging systems in predicting the prognosis of patients with gastric cancer. However MLR may exhibit advantages compared with LODDS for patients who have undergone adequate lymphadenectomies.
先前已证明,阳性淋巴结对数比值(LODDS)和转移淋巴结比率(MLR)分期系统在预测胃癌预后方面比肿瘤-淋巴结-转移(TNM)分期系统具有优势。本研究比较了最新的国际癌症控制联盟淋巴结分类与LODDS和MLR分期系统的预后意义。2010年9月至2012年12月,对苏州大学附属第三医院所有胃癌患者的病历进行回顾性分析,并复习其临床病理特征。选择截断点将胃癌患者分为不同组。进行单因素和多因素分析以确定胃癌的预后危险因素。采用Harrell一致性指数(C指数)比较三种分期系统的预后价值。本研究共分析了877例符合纳入标准的胃癌患者。患者根据三个MLR亚组分类如下:MLR0(MLR = 0)、MLR1(0 < MLR≤0.28)和MLR2(0.28 < MLR < 1)。患者根据LODDS亚组分类如下:LODDS1(LODDS≤ - 0.5)、LODDS2( - 0.5 < LODDS≤0)、LODDS3(0 < LODDS≤0.5)和LODDS4(LODDS>0.5)。基于多因素分析,LODDS、MLR和病理淋巴结(pN)分期可显著预测胃癌患者的生存率。根据C指数,与其他两种分期系统相比,LODDS分期系统能更准确地预测胃癌患者的5年总生存率。总之,本研究已确定,在预测胃癌患者预后方面,LODDS可能优于MLR和pN分期系统。然而,对于接受了充分淋巴结清扫术的患者,MLR可能比LODDS具有优势。