Shirmohammadie Musa, Ebrahim Soltani Alireza, Arbabi Shahriar, Nasseri Karim
Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj , Iran.
Acta Biomed. 2019 Jan 15;89(4):513-518. doi: 10.23750/abm.v89i4.5775.
• Background: Caudal epidural is the most commonly used technique for the management of postoperative pain in children. The aim of the present study was to assess and compare the efficacy of caudal bupivacaine as a postoperative analgesic alone or combined with midazolam, ketamine, and neostigmine in pediatric patients undergoing lower abdominal surgery.
Eighty pediatric patients categorized under the American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status I and II Classification System, who have been scheduled to undergo lower abdominal surgery were randomly designated into four groups to receive caudal block with either 1 ml/kg of 0.25% caudal bupivacaine for group B, 1 ml/kg of 0.25% caudal bupivacaine mixed with 2 μg/kg neostigmine for group BN, 1 ml/kg of 0.25% caudal bupivacaine mixed with 0.5 mg/kg ketamine for group BK or 1 ml/kg of 0.25% caudal bupivacaine mixed with 50 mcg/kg midazolam for group BM. Postoperative analgesia was examined by a blinded anesthetist utilizing a Revised Faces Pain Scale.Consumption of the total amount of rescue analgesic each 24 h, postoperative time to requirement of the first dose and any adverse effects were noted.
The four groups were comparable as regards age, sex, weight, duration of surgery, heart rate, blood pressure and the time from induction of anesthesia to response to voice. The Revised Faces Pain Scale was 2.6±1.5 in group BN, 3.1±1.8 in group BM, 4.4±2.4 in group BK, and 5.6±1.3 in group B (p=0.005). Postoperative duration of analgesia was 433±68 min, 769±118 min, 1097±126 min and 1254±176 min in groups B, BK, BM and BN respectively (P=0.001). The dose of rescue analgesic within 24 h in group B was significantly higher than those of the other three groups (P<0.05).
Addition of either neostigmine, midazolam, or ketamine to caudal bupivacaine extended analgesia time and decreased rescue analgesic compared to bupivacaine alone in children who underwent lower abdominal surgery.
• 背景:骶管硬膜外阻滞是儿童术后疼痛管理中最常用的技术。本研究的目的是评估和比较在接受下腹部手术的儿科患者中,单独使用布比卡因骶管阻滞作为术后镇痛与联合使用咪达唑仑、氯胺酮和新斯的明的疗效。
将80例根据美国麻醉医师协会身体状况I级和II级分类系统分类、计划接受下腹部手术的儿科患者随机分为四组,分别接受骶管阻滞:B组给予1 ml/kg的0.25%布比卡因;BN组给予1 ml/kg的0.25%布比卡因与2 μg/kg新斯的明混合液;BK组给予1 ml/kg的0.25%布比卡因与0.5 mg/kg氯胺酮混合液;BM组给予1 ml/kg的0.25%布比卡因与50 mcg/kg咪达唑仑混合液。由一位不知情的麻醉师使用修订面部疼痛量表检查术后镇痛情况。记录每24小时急救镇痛药的总用量、术后至首次需要用药的时间以及任何不良反应。
四组在年龄、性别、体重、手术时间、心率、血压以及从麻醉诱导到对声音有反应的时间方面具有可比性。修订面部疼痛量表评分在BN组为2.6±1.5,BM组为3.1±1.8,BK组为4.4±2.4,B组为5.6±1.3(p = 0.005)。术后镇痛持续时间在B组、BK组、BM组和BN组分别为433±68分钟、769±118分钟、1097±126分钟和1254±176分钟(P = 0.001)。B组24小时内急救镇痛药的用量显著高于其他三组(P<0.05)。
在接受下腹部手术的儿童中,与单独使用布比卡因相比,在布比卡因骶管阻滞中添加新斯的明、咪达唑仑或氯胺酮可延长镇痛时间并减少急救镇痛药的用量。