Su Kai, Luan Jiyao, Wang Qingde, Yang Yong, Mei Wei, Zhang Zhongmin
Department of Spine Surgery, Zhengzhou Orthopedics Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan Province, China.
Graduate School, Henan University of Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, Henan Province, China.
World Neurosurg. 2019 Apr;124:e733-e739. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.01.011. Epub 2019 Jan 17.
To compare the impact of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) with open posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) on sagittal lumbar-pelvic radiographic parameters for degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS).
Of 48 patients with L4 single segmental DS, 25 underwent MIS-TLIF with Quadrant system and 23 underwent conventional open PLIF. Comparisons of data from the preoperative and final follow-up standing lateral lumbar x-rays, with the bilateral femoral heads, of the 2 groups were conducted using the following parameters: slip percentage (SP), lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope, lumbosacral angle, slip angle (SA), and the L1 axis and S1 distance (LASD).
The slip reduction rate (ΔSP) in the OPEN group was significantly higher than in the MIS group (67 ± 34% vs. 37 ± 51%, P = 0.018). The change of SA (ΔSA) in the OPEN group was significantly higher than in the MIS group (3 ± 7° vs. -3 ± 5°, P = 0.003). The change of LASD (ΔLASD) in the OPEN group was significantly lower than in the MIS group (-4 ± 15 mm vs. 4 ± 9 mm, P = 0.033). There were positive correlations between the preoperative SP and LASD, and ΔSA and the change of LL (ΔLL), and a negative correlation between ΔLL and the change of PT (ΔPT).
For low-grade DS, open PLIF has a higher rate of slip reduction compared to MIS-TLIF, and significantly reduces LASD, therefore, it is more conducive to improving lumbar sagittal balance.
比较微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术(MIS-TLIF)与开放后路腰椎椎体间融合术(PLIF)对退行性腰椎滑脱症(DS)患者腰椎-骨盆矢状位影像学参数的影响。
48例L4单节段DS患者中,25例行Quadrant系统辅助下的MIS-TLIF,23例行传统开放PLIF。对两组患者术前及末次随访时站立位腰椎侧位X线片(包括双侧股骨头)的数据进行比较,参数包括滑脱百分比(SP)、腰椎前凸(LL)、骨盆入射角、骨盆倾斜角(PT)、骶骨倾斜角、腰骶角、滑脱角(SA)以及L1轴与S1距离(LASD)。
开放组的滑脱复位率(ΔSP)显著高于微创组(67±34% 对 37±51%,P = 0.018)。开放组的SA变化(ΔSA)显著高于微创组(3±7° 对 -3±5°,P = 0.003)。开放组的LASD变化(ΔLASD)显著低于微创组(-4±15 mm对4±9 mm,P = 0.033)。术前SP与LASD、ΔSA与LL变化(ΔLL)之间呈正相关,ΔLL与PT变化(ΔPT)之间呈负相关。
对于低度DS,与MIS-TLIF相比,开放PLIF的滑脱复位率更高,且能显著降低LASD,因此更有利于改善腰椎矢状位平衡。