Suppr超能文献

山猫(和家猫)粪便微生物群的比较分子分析。

Comparative molecular analysis of fecal microbiota of bobcats ( and domestic cats .

作者信息

Eshar David, Lee Charlie, Weese J Scott

机构信息

Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, 1800 Denison Avenue, Manhattan, Kansas 66506, USA (Eshar); Department of Animal Sciences and Industry, Kansas State University, 131 Call Hall, Manhattan, Kansas 66506, USA (Lee); Department of Pathobiology, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1 (Weese).

出版信息

Can J Vet Res. 2019 Jan;83(1):42-49.

Abstract

The goal of this study was to explore and describe fecal microbiota of captive and wild bobcats and compare the results to those of domestic cats . Fecal samples from 27 bobcats (8 wild, 19 zoo-kept) were used for novel bacterial deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) identification using next-generation sequencing of the V4 region of the bacterial 16S ribosomal ribonucleic acid (rRNA) gene, analyzed by Illumina sequencing, and then compared to data obtained from a colony of 10 domestic cats. In this study, the microbiota of both species was dominated by Firmicutes, followed by Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, and Verrucomicrobia. When compared, fecal samples from bobcats harbored more Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria than fecal samples from domestic cats. There was a remarkable inter-bobcat variation in the relative abundances of the main bacterial genera. There were no significant differences, however, between the main phyla of the microbiota of the wild and domestic bobcats. Proteobacteria in wild bobcats ( = 0.079) and Firmicutes in zoo-kept bobcats ( = 0.079) approached significance. There were no differences in predominant genera between wild and captive bobcats. The results of this study showed that there are notable differences in fecal bacterial communities between domestic cats and both captive and wild bobcats. The lack of significant differences in bacterial communities between wild and zoo-kept bobcats suggests that the varied diet provided for these felids can result in a fecal microbiota resembling that generated by a wild diet.

摘要

本研究的目的是探索和描述圈养和野生短尾猫的粪便微生物群,并将结果与家猫的结果进行比较。来自27只短尾猫(8只野生、19只圈养于动物园)的粪便样本用于通过细菌16S核糖体核糖核酸(rRNA)基因V4区域的下一代测序进行新型细菌脱氧核糖核酸(DNA)鉴定,经Illumina测序分析,然后与从10只家猫群体获得的数据进行比较。在本研究中,两个物种的微生物群均以厚壁菌门为主,其次是变形菌门、放线菌门、拟杆菌门和疣微菌门。相比之下,短尾猫的粪便样本中变形菌门和放线菌门的含量高于家猫的粪便样本。主要细菌属的相对丰度在短尾猫之间存在显著差异。然而,野生和圈养短尾猫微生物群的主要门类之间没有显著差异。野生短尾猫中的变形菌门(=0.079)和圈养于动物园的短尾猫中的厚壁菌门(=0.079)接近显著水平。野生和圈养短尾猫的优势属没有差异。本研究结果表明,家猫与圈养和野生短尾猫的粪便细菌群落存在显著差异。野生和圈养于动物园的短尾猫之间细菌群落缺乏显著差异,这表明为这些猫科动物提供的多样化饮食可导致类似于野生饮食产生的粪便微生物群。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

1
Diagnosis and interpretation of intestinal dysbiosis in dogs and cats.犬猫肠道菌群失调的诊断与解读
Vet J. 2016 Sep;215:30-7. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2016.04.011. Epub 2016 Apr 25.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验