Tian Zhong-Hua, Wang Xin-Yi, Zhang Yu-Fei, Tian Yuan-Sheng
Department of Encephalopathy, Affiliated Hospital of Henan Academy of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou 450000, China.
Henan Academy of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou 450000.
Zhongguo Zhen Jiu. 2019 Jan 12;39(1):44-8. doi: 10.13703/j.0255-2930.2019.01.010.
To compare the clinical efficacy between herb-separated moxibustion and conventional moxibustion on ankylosing spondylitis (AS) based on oral administration of sulfasalazine enteric-coated tablets.
A total of 64 patients with AS of cold-dampness obstruction type were randomly divided into an herb-separated moxibustion group and a conventional moxibustion group, 32 cases in each one. Based on oral administration of sulfasalazine enteric-coated tablets, the patients in the conventional moxibustion group were treated with moxibustion at the area with Dazhui (GV 14) to Changqiang (GV 1) as center and about 10 cm in width; the moxibustion was given for 1 hour. In the herb-separated moxibustion group, the gauze was soaked in the medicinal liquor and ginger juice, and placed on the same moxibustion area as the conventional moxibustion group, followed by moxibustion for 1 hour. The treatment in the two groups was given once a week, three treatments constituted a course and totally three courses were given. The symptom quantification score, occipital-wall distance, Schober test, C-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) levels were observed before and after treatment in the two groups, and the clinical efficacy was evaluated.
Compared before treatment, the symptom quantification score, occipital-wall distance, CRP and ESR levels were lower but the Schober test was higher after treatment in the two groups (all <0.05). The symptom quantification score, Schober test, CRP and ESR levels in the herb-separated moxibustion group were superior to those in the conventional moxibustion group (all <0.05), but no significant difference was observed on occipital-wall distance (>0.05). The total effective rate was 90.0% (27/30) in the herb-separated moxibustion group, which was higher than 73.3% (22/30) in the conventional moxibustion group (<0.05).
The herb-separated moxibustion combined with sulfasalazine enteric-coated tablets has significant efficacy for AS with cold-dampness obstruction type, which could obviously relieve pain symptoms, improve occipital-wall distance, Schober test and other physical signs, and improve the quality of life.
基于口服柳氮磺吡啶肠溶片,比较隔药灸与传统艾灸治疗强直性脊柱炎(AS)的临床疗效。
将64例寒湿痹阻型AS患者随机分为隔药灸组和传统艾灸组,每组32例。在口服柳氮磺吡啶肠溶片的基础上,传统艾灸组以大椎(GV 14)至长强(GV 1)为中心、宽度约10 cm的区域进行艾灸,艾灸1小时。隔药灸组将纱布浸泡在药酒和姜汁中,置于与传统艾灸组相同的艾灸区域,然后艾灸1小时。两组治疗均每周1次,3次治疗为1个疗程,共进行3个疗程。观察两组治疗前后的症状量化评分、枕墙距、Schober试验、C反应蛋白(CRP)及红细胞沉降率(ESR)水平,并评价临床疗效。
与治疗前比较,两组治疗后症状量化评分、枕墙距、CRP及ESR水平降低,Schober试验升高(均P<0.05)。隔药灸组的症状量化评分、Schober试验、CRP及ESR水平优于传统艾灸组(均P<0.05),但枕墙距差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。隔药灸组总有效率为90.0%(27/30),高于传统艾灸组的73.3%(22/30)(P<0.05)。
隔药灸联合柳氮磺吡啶肠溶片治疗寒湿痹阻型AS疗效显著,能明显缓解疼痛症状,改善枕墙距、Schober试验等体征,提高生活质量。