Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA.
Syrian Center for Tobacco Studies, Aleppo, Syria.
Tob Control. 2020 Mar;29(2):159-167. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2018-054718. Epub 2019 Jan 29.
Waterpipe (WP) smoking is increasing globally. The rise of WP has been fuelled by widespread misperception of reduced-harm compared to cigarettes. Health warning labels (HWLs) are one strategy to communicate smoking-related risks and address reduced-harm misperceptions. Therefore, the development of WP-specific HWLs represents a priority for WP control.
A panel of experts in WP science developed 28 WP-specific HWLs corresponding to five themes (health risks, addiction, harm to others, WP-specific harm, WP harm compared to cigarettes). Subsequently, a three-round Delphi study was conducted among international expert panel to reach consensus on a set of the most effective HWLs for each theme. Levels of agreement between participants were assessed using interquartile deviations, and the rank between the tied HWLs was based on the median.
Starting with 28 candidate HWLs stratified according to five WP-related themes, our international expert panel reached consensus on the 13 most important WP-specific HWLs. Labels with the highest agreement were related to oral and heart disease, WP's harmful effects on newborn children and the amount of smoke inhaled from WP compared to cigarettes.
This study is the first to systematically develop and evaluate potential WP-specific HWLs based on the scientific evidence about WP's harmful effects, scientific understanding of HWL for cigarettes and the opinions of experts in WP science, tobacco control and health communication. The final selected HWLs can be adapted based on the context and policy landscape of the target country and can be further fine-tuned based on feedback from WP smokers and non-smokers.
水烟(WP)吸烟在全球范围内呈上升趋势。与香烟相比,WP 危害性较小的这种普遍误解推动了 WP 的普及。健康警示标签(HWL)是一种传达与吸烟相关风险和解决危害性较小的误解的策略。因此,开发 WP 专用 HWL 代表 WP 控制的优先事项。
一组 WP 科学专家制定了 28 条 WP 专用 HWL,对应五个主题(健康风险、成瘾、对他人的伤害、WP 特定伤害、WP 伤害与香烟相比)。随后,在国际专家小组中进行了三轮 Delphi 研究,以就每个主题的一组最有效的 HWL 达成共识。使用四分位间距评估参与者之间的一致性水平,并列的 HWL 的等级基于中位数。
从根据五个 WP 相关主题分层的 28 个候选 HWL 开始,我们的国际专家小组就 13 个最重要的 WP 专用 HWL 达成了共识。具有最高一致性的标签与口腔和心脏病、WP 对新生儿的有害影响以及 WP 与香烟相比吸入的烟雾量有关。
这项研究是第一个根据 WP 有害影响的科学证据、关于香烟 HWL 的科学理解以及 WP 科学、烟草控制和健康传播方面的专家意见,系统地制定和评估 WP 专用 HWL 的研究。最终选择的 HWL 可以根据目标国家的背景和政策环境进行调整,并可以根据 WP 吸烟者和非吸烟者的反馈进行进一步调整。