Suppr超能文献

不稳定型股骨头骨骺滑脱原位固定的结果

The outcome of in-situ fixation of unstable slipped capital femoral epiphysis.

作者信息

Lang Pamela, Panchal Hemali, Delfosse Erin M, Silva Mauricio

机构信息

Orthopaedic Institute for Children.

Department of Orthopaedics, UCLA/Orthopaedic Hospital, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA.

出版信息

J Pediatr Orthop B. 2019 Sep;28(5):452-457. doi: 10.1097/BPB.0000000000000596.

Abstract

There is limited information regarding the outcome of in-situ fixation of unstable slipped capital femoral epiphysis (U-SCFE). We aimed to report the outcome of a cohort of patients with U-SCFE that were treated with in-situ fixation, by comparing it to the outcome of patients with stable slipped capital femoral epiphysis (S-SCFE). After Institutional Review Board approval, a retrospective analysis of patients with SCFE that were treated with in-situ fixation at a single institution between 2005 and 2016 was performed. Preoperative and postoperative clinical and radiographic data was collected. The rate of complications, including avascular necrosis (AVN), and the presence of impingement were recorded. The outcome of U-SCFEs was compared to that of S-SCFEs. A total of 184 SCFEs in 154 patients (64% male; mean age 11.9 years) with a mean follow-up of 27 months were included. The SCFE was classified as stable in 90.2% of cases, and unstable in 9.8% of. The mean duration of symptoms prior to presentation was 3.2 months. The mean Southwick slip angle at the time of presentation was 33°. A single screw was used to fix all S-SCFEs, while U-SCFEs were treated with either one (66.7%) or two (33.3%) screws. For U-SCFEs, the joint was decompressed at the time of surgery by either needle aspiration or small capsular incision. The final range of motion of the affected hip was comparable in both groups. The overall rate of impingement was 29%. The rate of impingement in S-SCFE and U-SCFE was 27.6 and 44.4%, respectively (P = 0.1). Eight patients required a subsequent surgery (4.4%), all of whom originally have had a S-SCFE. Radiographic signs of AVN of the femoral head were seen in 2.2% of cases. The incidence of AVN of the femoral head in S-SCFEs and U-SCFEs was 1.2 and 11.1%, respectively (P = 0.04). The results of this study support previous findings that the risk of AVN is significantly higher in U-SCFE as compared to S-SCFEs.

摘要

关于不稳定型股骨头骨骺滑脱(U-SCFE)原位固定的预后信息有限。我们旨在报告一组接受原位固定治疗的U-SCFE患者的预后情况,并将其与稳定型股骨头骨骺滑脱(S-SCFE)患者的预后进行比较。经机构审查委员会批准,对2005年至2016年间在单一机构接受原位固定治疗的SCFE患者进行了回顾性分析。收集了术前和术后的临床及影像学数据。记录并发症发生率,包括缺血性坏死(AVN)以及撞击的情况。将U-SCFE的预后与S-SCFE的预后进行比较。共纳入154例患者的184例SCFE(男性占64%;平均年龄11.9岁),平均随访27个月。90.2%的病例SCFE被分类为稳定型,9.8%为不稳定型。就诊前症状的平均持续时间为3.2个月。就诊时的平均Southwick滑脱角为33°。所有S-SCFE均使用单枚螺钉固定,而U-SCFE则使用一枚(66.7%)或两枚(33.3%)螺钉治疗。对于U-SCFE,手术时通过针吸或小切口关节囊切开对关节进行减压。两组中患侧髋关节的最终活动范围相当。总体撞击率为29%。S-SCFE和U-SCFE的撞击率分别为27.6%和44.4%(P = 0.1)。8例患者需要二次手术(4.4%),所有这些患者最初均为S-SCFE。2.2%的病例出现股骨头缺血性坏死的影像学表现。S-SCFE和U-SCFE中股骨头缺血性坏死的发生率分别为1.2%和11.1%(P = 0.04)。本研究结果支持先前的发现,即与S-SCFE相比,U-SCFE发生AVN的风险显著更高。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验