Suppr超能文献

单分支与双分支颞浅动脉-大脑中动脉搭桥术:对比分析。

Single-Barrel Versus Double-Barrel Superficial Temporal Artery to Middle Cerebral Artery Bypass: A Comparative Analysis.

机构信息

Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine Medical Center, Houston, Texas, USA.

Department of Neurological Surgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.

出版信息

World Neurosurg. 2019 May;125:e408-e415. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.01.089. Epub 2019 Jan 28.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The superficial temporal artery to middle cerebral artery (STA-MCA) bypass is the most common bypass for augmenting or restoring cerebral blood flow. Although the single-barrel (SB) STA-MCA bypass is sufficient in most cases, the double-barrel (DB) STA-MCA bypass can supply the demands of different vascular territories or multiple efferent arteries. We present a comparative analysis of SB and DB STA-MCA bypass in a large, consecutive series to examine indications, surgical results, and patient outcomes.

METHODS

A retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database identified all STA-MCA bypasses performed by a single surgeon over 21 years.

RESULTS

In total, 261 patients received 378 STA-MCA bypasses in 351 surgeries. SB STA-MCA bypasses were performed in 234 patients (90%), whereas DB STA-MCA bypasses were performed in 27 patients (10%). Patients with DB STA-MCA bypasses were more likely to undergo bilateral bypass procedures than those receiving SB STA-MCA bypass (P < 0.0001). In patients with bilateral STA-MCA bypasses (n = 91, 35%), 69 patients received bilateral SB STA-MCA bypasses (76%), whereas 22 patients received a DB STA-MCA bypass on 1 hemisphere (24%). There was no difference in bypass patency or clinical outcome in patients with SB and DB STA-MCA bypasses.

CONCLUSIONS

DB STA-MCA bypasses are reserved for patients requiring revascularization of multiple vascular territories or efferent arteries. DB STA-MCA bypasses have patency rates and patient outcomes comparable to SB STA-MCA, with the advantages of a single incision and reduced operative complexity compared to high-flow bypasses. DB STA-MCA bypass is an important element in the vascular neurosurgeon's bypass armamentarium.

摘要

目的

颞浅动脉到大脑中动脉(STA-MCA)搭桥术是最常见的增加或恢复脑血流的搭桥术。虽然单桶(SB)STA-MCA 搭桥术在大多数情况下已经足够,但双桶(DB)STA-MCA 搭桥术可以满足不同血管区域或多条输出动脉的需求。我们对一个大型连续系列中的 SB 和 DB STA-MCA 搭桥术进行了比较分析,以检查适应证、手术结果和患者预后。

方法

对一名外科医生在 21 年期间进行的前瞻性维护数据库进行回顾性审查,以确定所有接受 STA-MCA 搭桥术的患者。

结果

共有 261 名患者在 351 次手术中接受了 378 次 STA-MCA 搭桥术。234 名患者(90%)接受了 SB STA-MCA 搭桥术,而 27 名患者(10%)接受了 DB STA-MCA 搭桥术。接受 DB STA-MCA 搭桥术的患者比接受 SB STA-MCA 搭桥术的患者更有可能接受双侧搭桥手术(P < 0.0001)。在接受双侧 STA-MCA 搭桥术的患者(n = 91,35%)中,69 名患者接受了双侧 SB STA-MCA 搭桥术(76%),而 22 名患者在 1 个半球上接受了 DB STA-MCA 搭桥术(24%)。接受 SB 和 DB STA-MCA 搭桥术的患者在桥血管通畅率和临床结果方面没有差异。

结论

DB STA-MCA 搭桥术保留用于需要多血管区域或输出动脉再血管化的患者。DB STA-MCA 搭桥术与 SB STA-MCA 相比具有相似的通畅率和患者预后,与高流量搭桥术相比,具有单一切口和降低手术复杂性的优点。DB STA-MCA 搭桥术是血管神经外科医生搭桥工具包中的重要组成部分。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验