Department of Cardiology, Tsuchiura Clinical Education and Training Center, University of Tsukuba Hospital, Tsuchiura, Japan.
Department of Cardiology, National Hospital Organization Kasumigaura Medical Center, Tsuchiura, Japan.
ESC Heart Fail. 2019 Apr;6(2):396-405. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.12405. Epub 2019 Feb 1.
The objective of the study was to evaluate whether the geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI) at discharge may be helpful in predicting the long-term prognosis of patients hospitalized with heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF, left ventricular ejection fraction ≥50%), a common HF phenotype in the elderly.
Overall, 110 elderly HFpEF patients (≥65 years) from the Ibaraki Cardiovascular Assessment Study-HF (n = 838) were enrolled. The mean age was 78.5 ± 7.2 years, and male patients accounted for 53.6% (n = 59). All-cause mortality was compared between the low GNRI (<92) with moderate or severe nutritional risk group and the high GNRI (≥92) with no or low nutritional risk group. Cox proportional hazard regression models were constructed to evaluate the influence of the GNRI on all-cause death with the following covariates using forward stepwise selection: age, sex, nutritional status based on the GNRI as a categorical variable, history of HF hospitalization, haemoglobin level, estimated glomerular filtration rate, log brain natriuretic peptide levels (logBNP), history of hypertension, log C-reactive protein levels, left ventricular ejection fraction, left ventricular mass index, and the New York Heart Association functional classification (I/II or III class). The prognostic value of the GNRI was compared with that of serum albumin using C-statistics. The GNRI was added to the logBNP, serum albumin or the body mass index was added to the logBNP, and the C-statistic was compared using DeLong's test. Cox regression analysis revealed that age and a low GNRI were independent predictors of all-cause death (P < 0.05, n = 103; hazard ratio = 1.095, 95% confidence interval = 1.031-1.163, for age, and hazard ratio = 3.075, 95% confidence interval = 1.244-7.600, for the GNRI). DeLong's test for the two correlated receiver operating characteristic curves [area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of serum albumin, 0.71; AUROC of the GNRI, 0.75] demonstrated significant differences between the groups (P = 0.038). Adding the GNRI to the logBNP increased the AUROC for all-cause death significantly (0.71 and 0.80, respectively; P = 0.040, n = 105). The addition of serum albumin or the body mass index to the logBNP did not significantly increase the AUROC for all-cause death (P = 0.082 and P = 0.29, respectively).
Nutritional screening using the GNRI at discharge is helpful to predict the long-term prognosis of elderly HFpEF patients.
本研究旨在评估出院时的老年营养风险指数(GNRI)是否有助于预测射血分数保留的心力衰竭(HFpEF,左心室射血分数≥50%)老年患者的长期预后,HFpEF 是老年人中常见的心力衰竭表型。
本研究共纳入了来自茨城县心血管评估研究-心力衰竭(Ibaraki Cardiovascular Assessment Study-HF)的 110 名老年 HFpEF 患者(≥65 岁,n=838)。患者的平均年龄为 78.5±7.2 岁,男性占 53.6%(n=59)。比较低 GNRI(<92)伴中度或重度营养风险组和高 GNRI(≥92)伴无或低营养风险组的全因死亡率。使用向前逐步选择方法,构建 Cox 比例风险回归模型,使用以下协变量评估 GNRI 对全因死亡的影响:年龄、性别、基于 GNRI 的营养状况(作为分类变量)、心力衰竭住院史、血红蛋白水平、估算肾小球滤过率、log 脑钠肽水平(logBNP)、高血压史、logC-反应蛋白水平、左心室射血分数、左心室质量指数和纽约心脏协会功能分类(I/II 级或 III 级)。使用 C 统计量比较 GNRI 的预后价值与血清白蛋白的预后价值。将 GNRI 添加到 logBNP 中,或在 logBNP 中添加血清白蛋白或体重指数,使用 DeLong 检验比较 C 统计量。Cox 回归分析显示,年龄和低 GNRI 是全因死亡的独立预测因素(P<0.05,n=103;危险比=1.095,95%置信区间=1.031-1.163,年龄;危险比=3.075,95%置信区间=1.244-7.600,GNRI)。对两组相关受试者工作特征曲线(血清白蛋白的受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUROC),0.71;GNRI 的 AUROC,0.75)的 DeLong 检验显示两组间存在显著差异(P=0.038)。将 GNRI 添加到 logBNP 中可显著提高全因死亡的 AUROC(分别为 0.71 和 0.80;P=0.040,n=105)。在 logBNP 中添加血清白蛋白或体重指数不会显著提高全因死亡的 AUROC(P=0.082 和 P=0.29)。
出院时使用 GNRI 进行营养筛查有助于预测老年 HFpEF 患者的长期预后。