Suppr超能文献

传统手术与一期无缝合手术修复心上型完全性肺静脉异位引流的比较

Comparison of conventional and primary sutureless surgery for repairing supracardiac total anomalous pulmonary venous drainage.

作者信息

Zhu Yongfeng, Qi Hewen, Jin Yunzhou

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular surgery, Zhengzhou Cardiovascular Hospital, Henan cardiovascular disease hospital affiliated to Southern Medical University, Zhengzhou No.7 People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, 450000, China.

Department of Cardiovascular surgery, Tangshan Workers' Hospital, Tangshan, 063000, Hebei, China.

出版信息

J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019 Feb 8;14(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s13019-019-0853-7.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The efficacy of using a sutureless approach in order to surgically manage postoperative pulmonary vein stenosis following total anomalous pulmonary venous drainage (TAPVD) has been reported, though outcomes of primary treatment of supracardiac TAPVD remain unclear. We retrospectively reviewed our cardiac center experience, and compared the differences in mid-term outcomes for those patients that received conventional surgery and those that underwent sutureless technique for the primary repair of supracardiac TAPVD.

METHODS

A total of 43 patients (median age, 199 days; range, 35 days to 1572 days) with supracardiac TAPVD underwent surgical treatment at our cardiac center from 2014 to 2018 were studied retrospectively. Primary sutureless repair was conducted in 20 cases (46.5%). The pulmonary vein scores, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), baseline of the included patients, postoperative, and outcomes data were analyzed between the two groups.

RESULTS

The pulmonary vein scores, indicating the stenosis degree, of two groups were 0.1 ± 0.3 and 0.1 ± 0.3, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (%) were separately 66.2 ± 12.1 and 67.1 ± 13.6. The average cardiopulmonary bypass time of sutureless techniques group was much longer than conventional group (96.2 ± 32.6 min vs 75.6 ± 28.2 min, P < 0.05), but there was no difference in aortic cross-clamp time between the two groups. Followed up from 0.1 to 4 years, 3 cases died overall, with 1 (5.0%) individual dying from postoperative pulmonary venous obstruction (PVO) in sutureless group, and 2 (8.6%) dying in the conventional group respectively for postoperative infection and post-PVO. There were no differences in the length of stay in the ICU, grades of PVS after surgery, LVEF and reoperation rate between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The mortality, post-PVO, follow up results of supracadiac TAPVD showed no differences between sutureless and conventional techniques. Post-PVO supposed to be the main reason for postoperative mortality.

摘要

目的

已有报道称采用无缝合方法手术治疗完全性肺静脉异位引流(TAPVD)术后的肺静脉狭窄有效,但心上型TAPVD的初次治疗结果仍不明确。我们回顾性分析了我们心脏中心的经验,并比较了接受传统手术和采用无缝合技术进行心上型TAPVD初次修复的患者的中期结果差异。

方法

回顾性研究了2014年至2018年在我们心脏中心接受手术治疗的43例心上型TAPVD患者(中位年龄199天;范围35天至1572天)。20例(46.5%)患者进行了初次无缝合修复。分析了两组患者的肺静脉评分、左心室射血分数(LVEF)、纳入患者的基线、术后情况及结果数据。

结果

两组表示狭窄程度的肺静脉评分分别为0.1±0.3和0.1±0.3,左心室射血分数(LVEF)(%)分别为66.2±12.1和67.1±13.6。无缝合技术组的平均体外循环时间比传统组长得多(96.2±32.6分钟对75.6±28.2分钟,P<0.05),但两组之间的主动脉阻断时间无差异。随访0.1至4年,共3例死亡,无缝合组1例(5.0%)死于术后肺静脉梗阻(PVO),传统组2例(8.6%)分别死于术后感染和PVO后。两组在ICU住院时间、术后PVS分级、LVEF和再次手术率方面无差异。

结论

心上型TAPVD的死亡率、PVO后情况、随访结果在无缝合技术和传统技术之间无差异。PVO后情况被认为是术后死亡的主要原因。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03b7/6368785/5cda79c2d94d/13019_2019_853_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验