Suppr超能文献

马苏德评分指数与改良马苏德评分指数:一项乳腺病变细针穿刺细胞学检查与组织病理学相关性的评估。

Masood's and Modified Masood's Scoring Index: An Evaluation of Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology of Breast Lesions with Histopathological Correlation.

作者信息

Agarwal Charu, Chauhan Varsha, Pujani Mukta, Singh Kanika, Raychaudhari Sujata, Singh Mitasha

机构信息

Department of Pathology, ESIC Medical College, Faridabad, India.

Department of Pathology, ESIC Medical College, Faridabad, India,

出版信息

Acta Cytol. 2019;63(3):233-239. doi: 10.1159/000496139. Epub 2019 Feb 13.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

As fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is the primary tool for evaluation of breast lesions, it is essential to segregate lesions with low and high risk of malignancy. To address this, Masood proposed a cytological scoring system for categorization, Masood's Scoring Index (MSI), which was modified later (Modified Masood's Scoring Index [MMSI]). This study analyses the effectiveness of MMSI over MSI and assesses the concordance between cytological scoring and histopathology.

STUDY DESIGN

All breast FNACs over a period of 2 years were categorized based on MSI and MMSI by 2 reviewers independently. The agreement rate along with specificity, sensitivity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and diagnostic accuracy were calculated. Correlation and concordance analyses between cytological and histopathological categories were conducted.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Out of 415 cases of breast FNACs, histopathology was available for 310 for which MSI and MMSI were evaluated. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and diagnostic accuracy were 95, 100, 100, 97.6 and 98.3%, respectively. The difference between the concordance rate of MSI and of MMSI for various cytological categories was found to be statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

MMSI has a better concordance with histopathological diagnosis than MSI. MMSI can serve as a uniform standardized scoring system for breast cytology for better categorization of proliferative breast diseases.

摘要

目的

由于细针穿刺细胞学检查(FNAC)是评估乳腺病变的主要手段,因此区分恶性风险低和高的病变至关重要。为解决这一问题,马苏德提出了一种用于分类的细胞学评分系统,即马苏德评分指数(MSI),该指数后来进行了修改(改良马苏德评分指数 [MMSI])。本研究分析了MMSI相对于MSI的有效性,并评估了细胞学评分与组织病理学之间的一致性。

研究设计

由两名审阅者独立根据MSI和MMSI对2年内所有乳腺FNAC进行分类。计算一致率以及特异性、敏感性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值和诊断准确性。对细胞学和组织病理学分类之间进行相关性和一致性分析。

结果与讨论

在415例乳腺FNAC病例中,有310例可获得组织病理学结果,并对其进行了MSI和MMSI评估。敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值和诊断准确性分别为95%、100%、100%、97.6%和98.3%。发现不同细胞学分类的MSI和MMSI一致率之间的差异具有统计学意义。

结论

MMSI与组织病理学诊断的一致性优于MSI。MMSI可作为乳腺细胞学的统一标准化评分系统,以便更好地对增生性乳腺疾病进行分类。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验