Suppr超能文献

评估面向旁观者的高中生人际暴力预防计划。

Evaluation of a Bystander-Focused Interpersonal Violence Prevention Program with High School Students.

机构信息

Departments of Psychology and Prevention Innovations Research Center, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, USA.

Rutgers University, School of Social Work, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.

出版信息

Prev Sci. 2019 May;20(4):488-498. doi: 10.1007/s11121-019-01000-w. Epub 2019 Feb 14.

Abstract

This study evaluated the effectiveness of a seven-session, bystander-focused, classroom-delivered curriculum (i.e., Bringing in the Bystander-High School Curriculum [BITB-HSC]) in reducing rates of interpersonal violence among high school students. High schools (N = 26) were randomly assigned to the treatment or control condition. In classrooms in treatment schools, students (n = 1081) completed a baseline survey, participated in the BITB-HSC, and completed an immediate post-test, a short-term post-test (approx. 2 months after intervention), and a long-term post-test (approx. 1 year after intervention). Youth in control schools (n = 1322) completed surveys at similar time points but did not participate in the BITB-HSC. Participants were 15.8 years old on average and largely White (85.1%) and heterosexual (84.5%). Students exposed to the BITB-HSC demonstrated significant short-term changes in victim empathy and bystander barriers/facilitators, and long-term changes in rape myths, media literacy, bystander readiness, and knowledge relative to youth in the control condition. Although the BITB-HSC had little long-term impact on actual bystander behavior, there were reductions in some forms of violence among students in the BITB-HSC condition relative to the control condition. Future research is needed to determine if, for whom, why, and in what contexts (e.g., classroom-based versus school-wide initiatives) bystander-focused violence prevention initiatives reduce violence.

摘要

本研究评估了一个七节、以旁观者为重点、课堂教学的课程(即“引入旁观者-高中课程”[BITB-HSC])在减少高中生人际暴力发生率方面的有效性。高中(N=26)被随机分配到治疗或对照组。在治疗学校的教室里,学生(n=1081)完成了基线调查,参加了 BITB-HSC,并完成了即时后测、短期后测(干预后约 2 个月)和长期后测(干预后约 1 年)。对照组学校的学生(n=1322)在相似的时间点完成了调查,但没有参加 BITB-HSC。参与者的平均年龄为 15.8 岁,主要是白人(85.1%)和异性恋(84.5%)。暴露于 BITB-HSC 的学生在短期内表现出对受害者同理心和旁观者障碍/促进因素的显著变化,以及在长期内对强奸神话、媒体素养、旁观者准备度和知识的变化,与对照组的同龄人相比。尽管 BITB-HSC 对实际旁观者行为的长期影响不大,但与对照组相比,BITB-HSC 组的学生在某些形式的暴力行为有所减少。需要进一步研究来确定旁观者为重点的暴力预防计划是否以及在何种情况下(例如,课堂式与全校范围的举措)、针对哪些人、为何以及在何种情况下可以减少暴力。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of a Bystander-Focused Interpersonal Violence Prevention Program with High School Students.
Prev Sci. 2019 May;20(4):488-498. doi: 10.1007/s11121-019-01000-w. Epub 2019 Feb 14.
2
Preventing Teen Relationship Abuse and Sexual Assault through Bystander Training: Intervention Outcomes for School Personnel.
Am J Community Psychol. 2020 Mar;65(1-2):160-172. doi: 10.1002/ajcp.12379. Epub 2019 Aug 26.
3
6
RCT Testing Bystander Effectiveness to Reduce Violence.
Am J Prev Med. 2017 May;52(5):566-578. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.01.020. Epub 2017 Mar 6.
8
Youth Strategies for Positive Bystander Action in Situations of Dating and Sexual Violence: Implications for Measurement and Programming.
J Interpers Violence. 2021 Jul;36(13-14):NP7653-NP7674. doi: 10.1177/0886260519829287. Epub 2019 Feb 15.
9
Multi-College Bystander Intervention Evaluation for Violence Prevention.
Am J Prev Med. 2016 Mar;50(3):295-302. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.08.034. Epub 2015 Nov 2.
10
Do Violence Acceptance and Bystander Actions Explain the Effects of Green Dot on Reducing Violence Perpetration in High Schools?
J Interpers Violence. 2021 Nov;36(21-22):10753-10774. doi: 10.1177/0886260519888206. Epub 2019 Nov 13.

引用本文的文献

3
Preliminary Evaluation of the SafeBAE Youth-Developed Sexual Violence Prevention Summit.
J Child Sex Abus. 2024 Jul 30:1-15. doi: 10.1080/10538712.2024.2385468.
4
Gender equitable attitudes as a significant mediator of bystander intentions among sexual minority adolescents.
J Adolesc. 2023 Oct;95(7):1409-1419. doi: 10.1002/jad.12214. Epub 2023 Jul 10.
6
Interventions that address institutional child maltreatment: An evidence and gap map.
Campbell Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 9;17(1):e1139. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1139. eCollection 2021 Mar.
9
Exposure to a Youth-Led Sexual Violence Prevention Program Among Adolescents: The Impact of Engagement.
Psychol Violence. 2022 Nov;12(6):403-412. doi: 10.1037/vio0000413. Epub 2022 Feb 14.
10
Exploring the Activities and Target Audiences of School-Based Violence Prevention Programs: Systematic Review and Intervention Component Analysis.
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2023 Dec;24(5):3593-3614. doi: 10.1177/15248380221134294. Epub 2022 Nov 30.

本文引用的文献

3
A systematic review of primary prevention strategies for sexual violence perpetration.
Aggress Violent Behav. 2014 Jul-Aug;19(4):346-362. doi: 10.1016/j.avb.2014.05.004.
5
RCT Testing Bystander Effectiveness to Reduce Violence.
Am J Prev Med. 2017 May;52(5):566-578. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.01.020. Epub 2017 Mar 6.
6
Beyond the Situational Model: Bystander Action Consequences to Intervening in Situations Involving Sexual Violence.
J Interpers Violence. 2018 Oct;33(20):3211-3231. doi: 10.1177/0886260516635319. Epub 2016 Mar 2.
7
Incidence and Outcomes of Dating Violence Victimization Among High School Youth: The Role of Gender and Sexual Orientation.
J Interpers Violence. 2018 May;33(9):1472-1490. doi: 10.1177/0886260515618943. Epub 2015 Dec 13.
8
Addressing Item-Level Missing Data: A Comparison of Proration and Full Information Maximum Likelihood Estimation.
Multivariate Behav Res. 2015;50(5):504-19. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2015.1068157.
9
Bystander Action in Situations of Dating and Sexual Aggression: A Mixed Methodological Study of High School Youth.
J Youth Adolesc. 2015 Dec;44(12):2321-36. doi: 10.1007/s10964-015-0307-z. Epub 2015 Jun 6.
10
Changing attitudes about being a bystander to violence: translating an in-person sexual violence prevention program to a new campus.
Violence Against Women. 2015 Feb;21(2):165-87. doi: 10.1177/1077801214564681. Epub 2014 Dec 24.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验