Grains & Legumes Nutrition Council, North Sydney, NSW 2060, Australia.
Nutrients. 2019 Feb 15;11(2):415. doi: 10.3390/nu11020415.
The Australian front-of-pack labelling system, Health Star Rating (HSR), does not include whole grain (WG) in its algorithm, but uses dietary fibre (DF), despite Dietary Guidelines recommending WG over refined grain (RG) foods. This study aimed to determine how effectively HSR differentiates WG and RG foods. Product label data were collected 2017⁻18 from bread, rice, pasta, noodles, flour and breakfast cereals ( = 1127). Products not displaying HSR, DF per 100 g, and %WG ingredients were excluded, leaving a sample of 441 products; 68% were WG (≥8 g/manufacturer serving). There was a significant difference ( < 0.001) in HSR between WG bread and breakfast cereal over RG varieties, yet the mean difference in stars depicted on the pack was only 0.4 for bread and 0.7 for breakfast cereal. There was no difference for rice ( = 0.131) or flour ( = 0.376). Median HSR also poorly differentiated WG. More WG foods scored 4⁻5 stars compared to RG, yet there was notable overlap between 3.5⁻5 stars. DF content between RG and WG subcategories was significantly different, however wide variation and overlap in DF highlights that this may not be a sufficient proxy measure, raising concerns that the HSR algorithm may not adequately communicate the benefits for consumers of swapping to WG foods.
澳大利亚的预包装食品标签系统,健康星级评分(HSR),其算法中不包括全麦(WG),而是使用膳食纤维(DF),尽管饮食指南建议用 WG 代替精制谷物(RG)食品。本研究旨在确定 HSR 如何有效地区分 WG 和 RG 食品。2017-18 年收集了面包、大米、意大利面、面条、面粉和早餐麦片(=1127)的产品标签数据。排除未显示 HSR、每 100 克 DF 和 %WG 成分的产品,留下 441 种产品的样本;68%是 WG(≥8 克/制造商份量)。WG 面包和早餐麦片与 RG 品种之间的 HSR 存在显著差异(<0.001),但包装上显示的星级差异平均值仅为面包的 0.4 星和早餐麦片的 0.7 星。大米(=0.131)或面粉(=0.376)则没有差异。中位 HSR 也不能很好地区分 WG。与 RG 相比,更多的 WG 食品得分为 4-5 星,但 3.5-5 星之间存在明显重叠。RG 和 WG 亚类之间的 DF 含量存在显著差异,但 DF 的广泛变化和重叠表明,这可能不是一个足够的替代衡量标准,这引发了人们的担忧,即 HSR 算法可能无法充分向消费者传达转换为 WG 食品的好处。