Tan Woan Shin, Bajpai Ram, Ho Andy Hau Yan, Low Chan Kee, Car Josip
Centre for Population Health Sciences, Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.
NTU Institute for Health Technologies, Interdisciplinary Graduate School, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.
BMJ Open. 2019 Feb 19;9(2):e024662. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024662.
To describe the end-of-life care preferences of individuals, and to examine the influence of age and gender on these preferences.
DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted. Participants included all adults (≥21 years old) (n=3380) who had completed a statement of their preferences as part of a national Advance Care Planning (ACP) programme in Singapore. Data were extracted from the national and Tan Tock Seng Hospital ACP database.
End-of-life care preferences were obtained from the ACP document and differentiated by health status (healthy, chronically ill or diagnosed with advanced illnesses). To analyse the data, descriptive statistics and logistic regression analysis were used.
Across healthy and chronically ill patients, the majority did not opt for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) or other life-sustaining measures. Among individuals with advanced illnesses, 94% preferred not to attempt CPR but 69% still preferred to receive some form of active medical treatment. Approximately 40% chose to be cared for, and to die at home. Age and sex significantly predict preferences in those with advanced illnesses. Older age (>=75 years) showed higher odds for home as preferred place of care (OR 1.52; 95% CI 1.23 to 1.89) and place of death (OR 1.29; 95% CI 1.03 to 1.61) and lower odds for CPR (OR 0.31; 95% CI 0.18 to 0.54) and full treatment (OR 0.32; 95% CI 0.17 to 0.62). Being female was associated with lower odds for home as preferred place of care (OR 0.69; 95% CI 0.57 to 0.84) and place of death (OR 0.70; 95% CI 0.57 to 0.85) and higher odds for full treatment (OR 2.35; 95% CI 1.18 to 4.68).
The majority preferred to not proceed with life-sustaining treatments, but there was still a strong preference to receive some form of limited treatment. Better understanding of end-of-life care preferences through ACP can better guide end-of-life care programme planning, and resource allocation decisions.
描述个体的临终关怀偏好,并研究年龄和性别对这些偏好的影响。
设计、背景与参与者:进行了一项回顾性队列研究。参与者包括所有完成了偏好声明的成年人(≥21岁)(n = 3380),这些声明是新加坡全国性预先护理计划(ACP)项目的一部分。数据从全国性和陈笃生医院的ACP数据库中提取。
从ACP文件中获取临终关怀偏好,并按健康状况(健康、慢性病或被诊断为晚期疾病)进行区分。为分析数据,使用了描述性统计和逻辑回归分析。
在健康和慢性病患者中,大多数人未选择心肺复苏(CPR)或其他维持生命的措施。在晚期疾病患者中,94%的人不希望尝试CPR,但69%的人仍希望接受某种形式的积极医疗治疗。约40%的人选择在家中接受护理并离世。年龄和性别显著预测晚期疾病患者的偏好。年龄较大(≥75岁)的人选择在家中接受护理(比值比1.52;95%置信区间1.23至1.89)和离世(比值比1.29;95%置信区间1.03至1.61)的可能性更高,而选择CPR(比值比0.31;95%置信区间0.18至0.54)和全面治疗(比值比0.32;95%置信区间0.17至0.62)的可能性更低。女性选择在家中接受护理(比值比0.69;95%置信区间0.57至0.84)和离世(比值比0.70;95%置信区间0.57至0.85)的可能性较低,而选择全面治疗(比值比2.35;95%置信区间1.18至4.68)的可能性较高。
大多数人倾向于不进行维持生命的治疗,但仍强烈希望接受某种形式的有限治疗。通过ACP更好地了解临终关怀偏好可以更好地指导临终关怀项目规划和资源分配决策。