Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Dept of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Eur Respir J. 2019 Apr 25;53(4). doi: 10.1183/13993003.01530-2018. Print 2019 Apr.
We evaluated the effectiveness of an interdisciplinary, primary care-based model of care for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).A cluster randomised controlled trial was conducted in 43 general practices in Australia. Adults with a history of smoking and/or COPD, aged ≥40 years with two or more clinic visits in the previous year were enrolled following spirometric confirmation of COPD. The model of care comprised smoking cessation support, home medicines review (HMR) and home-based pulmonary rehabilitation (HomeBase). Main outcomes included changes in St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) score, COPD Assessment Test (CAT), dyspnoea, smoking abstinence and lung function at 6 and 12 months.We identified 272 participants with COPD (157 intervention, 115 usual care); 49 (31%) out of 157 completed both HMR and HomeBase. Intention-to-treat analysis showed no statistically significant difference in change in SGRQ at 6 months (adjusted between-group difference 2.45 favouring intervention, 95% CI -0.89-5.79). Per protocol analyses showed clinically and statistically significant improvements in SGRQ in those receiving the full intervention compared to usual care (difference 5.22, 95% CI 0.19-10.25). No statistically significant differences were observed in change in CAT, dyspnoea, smoking abstinence or lung function.No significant evidence was found for the effectiveness of this interdisciplinary model of care for COPD in primary care over usual care. Low uptake was a limitation.
我们评估了一种基于初级保健的 COPD 多学科护理模式的有效性。该研究在澳大利亚的 43 家全科诊所进行了一项集群随机对照试验。符合以下条件的成年吸烟者和/或 COPD 患者,年龄≥40 岁,在过去一年中有两次或以上的就诊记录,经过肺量计确诊 COPD 后,将被纳入研究。该护理模式包括戒烟支持、家庭用药审查(HMR)和家庭基础肺康复(HomeBase)。主要结果包括圣乔治呼吸问卷(SGRQ)评分、COPD 评估测试(CAT)、呼吸困难、戒烟和肺功能在 6 个月和 12 个月时的变化。我们共识别出 272 名 COPD 患者(157 名干预组,115 名对照组);在干预组中,有 49 名(31%)患者完成了 HMR 和 HomeBase。意向治疗分析显示,在 6 个月时,SGRQ 评分的变化没有统计学意义(调整后的组间差异为 2.45,有利于干预组,95%CI -0.89-5.79)。基于方案的分析显示,接受完整干预的患者在 SGRQ 方面有显著的临床和统计学改善,而对照组则没有(差异为 5.22,95%CI 0.19-10.25)。在 CAT、呼吸困难、戒烟或肺功能方面,没有观察到统计学显著的变化。该研究未发现该跨学科 COPD 初级保健护理模式在常规护理基础上的有效性。低参与率是一个限制。