University of Utah, Utah Center for Advanced Imaging Research, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, 729 Arapeen Drive, Salt Lake City, UT 84108-1217, USA.
Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc. 2019 Feb;110:34-61. doi: 10.1016/j.pnmrs.2019.01.003. Epub 2019 Jan 31.
Most parameters that influence the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) signal experience a temperature dependence. The fact that MRI can be used for non-invasive measurements of temperature and temperature change deep inside the human body has been known for over 30 years. Today, MR temperature imaging is widely used to monitor and evaluate thermal therapies such as radio frequency, microwave, laser, and focused ultrasound therapy. In this paper we cover the physical principles underlying the biological applications of MR temperature imaging and discuss practical considerations and remaining challenges. For biological tissue, the MR signal of interest comes mostly from hydrogen protons of water molecules but also from protons in, e.g., adipose tissue and various metabolites. Most of the discussed methods, such as those using the proton resonance frequency (PRF) shift, T, T, and diffusion only measure temperature change, but measurements of absolute temperatures are also possible using spectroscopic imaging methods (taking advantage of various metabolite signals as internal references) or various types of contrast agents. Currently, the PRF method is the most used clinically due to good sensitivity, excellent linearity with temperature, and because it is largely independent of tissue type. Because the PRF method does not work in adipose tissues, T- and T-based methods have recently gained interest for monitoring temperature change in areas with high fat content such as the breast and abdomen. Absolute temperature measurement methods using spectroscopic imaging and contrast agents often offer too low spatial and temporal resolution for accurate monitoring of ablative thermal procedures, but have shown great promise in monitoring the slower and usually less spatially localized temperature change observed during hyperthermia procedures. Much of the current research effort for ablative procedures is aimed at providing faster measurements, larger field-of-view coverage, simultaneous monitoring in aqueous and adipose tissues, and more motion-insensitive acquisitions for better precision measurements in organs such as the heart, liver, and kidneys. For hyperthermia applications, larger coverage, motion insensitivity, and simultaneous aqueous and adipose monitoring are also important, but great effort is also aimed at solving the problem of long-term field drift which gets interpreted as temperature change when using the PRF method.
大多数影响磁共振成像(MRI)信号的参数都具有温度依赖性。MRI 可用于非侵入式测量人体内部深处的温度和温度变化,这一事实已经为人所知超过 30 年。如今,MR 温度成像是广泛用于监测和评估诸如射频、微波、激光和聚焦超声治疗等热疗的方法。在本文中,我们涵盖了 MR 温度成像在生物学应用中的物理原理,并讨论了实际考虑因素和遗留挑战。对于生物组织,感兴趣的 MR 信号主要来自水分子中的氢质子,但也来自脂肪组织和各种代谢物中的质子等。大多数讨论的方法,例如利用质子共振频率(PRF)位移、T1、T2 和扩散的方法,仅测量温度变化,但也可以使用光谱成像方法(利用各种代谢物信号作为内部参考)或各种类型的对比剂来测量绝对温度。目前,由于具有良好的灵敏度、与温度的出色线性度以及对组织类型的高度不依赖性,PRF 方法是临床上最常用的方法。由于 PRF 方法在脂肪组织中不起作用,因此基于 T1 和 T2 的方法最近在监测富含脂肪的区域(如乳房和腹部)的温度变化方面引起了关注。使用光谱成像和对比剂的绝对温度测量方法通常提供的空间和时间分辨率太低,无法准确监测消融热程序,但在监测在高热疗程序中观察到的较慢且通常空间局部化程度较低的温度变化方面显示出巨大的潜力。目前,针对消融程序的大部分研究工作旨在提供更快的测量、更大的视野覆盖范围、在水和脂肪组织中同时监测以及对心脏、肝脏和肾脏等器官进行更精确的测量的运动不敏感采集。对于热疗应用,更大的覆盖范围、运动不敏感性以及同时的水和脂肪监测也很重要,但也需要努力解决使用 PRF 方法时被解释为温度变化的长期场漂移问题。