Tang Bingtao, Guo Zong Sheng, Bartlett David L, Liu Jia, McFadden Grant, Shisler Joanna L, Roy Edward J
Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA,
Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Oncolytic Virother. 2019 Feb 11;8:3-8. doi: 10.2147/OV.S189832. eCollection 2019.
Oncolytic viruses selectively infect cancer cells while avoiding infection of normal cells. Usually, selectivity is demonstrated by injecting a virus into tumor-bearing mice and observing infection and lysis of tumor cells without infection of other tissues. The general view is that this selectivity is due to tropisms of the virus. However, apparent selectivity could be due to accessibility. For example, intravenously injected virus may not gain access to cells within the central nervous system (CNS) because of the blood-brain barrier.
We tested the CNS safety of two oncolytic poxviruses that have been demonstrated to be safe for treatment of peripheral tumors (vaccinia virus vvDD-IL15-Rα and myxoma virus vMyx-IL15Rα-tdTr).
Two poxviruses were tested for selectivity in vitro and in vivo.
Both viruses infected glioma cells in vitro. In vivo, both viruses infected glioma cells and did not infect neurons when injected into a tumor or into the normal striatum. However, viral gene expression was observed in ependymal cells lining the ventricles, implying that these poxviruses were not as selective as originally predicted. For vvDD-IL15-Rα, some tumor-bearing mice died soon after virus treatment. If the same titer of vvDD-IL15-Rα was injected directly into the lateral cerebral ventricle of nontumor-bearing mice, it was uniformly fatal. Infection of ependymal cells, subventricular cells, and meninges was widespread. On the other hand, vMyx-IL15Rα-tdTr only transiently infected ependymal cells and was safe even when injected directly into the lateral cerebral ventricles. The two poxviruses also differed in their infection of dendritic cells; vvDD-IL15-Rα infected dendritic cells and lysed them but vMyx-IL15Rα-tdTr did not.
Vaccinia virus vvDD-IL15-Rα is very promising for treating cancer types outside of the brain. However, for cancers located within the brain, myxoma virus vMyx-IL15Rα-tdTr offers a safer alternative.
溶瘤病毒可选择性感染癌细胞,同时避免感染正常细胞。通常,通过将病毒注射到荷瘤小鼠体内,并观察肿瘤细胞的感染和裂解情况,而其他组织未被感染,以此来证明其选择性。普遍观点认为这种选择性归因于病毒的嗜性。然而,表面上的选择性可能是由于可达性。例如,由于血脑屏障,静脉注射的病毒可能无法进入中枢神经系统(CNS)内的细胞。
我们测试了两种已被证明对治疗外周肿瘤安全的溶瘤痘病毒(痘苗病毒vvDD-IL15-Rα和黏液瘤病毒vMyx-IL15Rα-tdTr)对中枢神经系统的安全性。
对两种痘病毒进行了体外和体内选择性测试。
两种病毒在体外均能感染胶质瘤细胞。在体内,当将两种病毒注射到肿瘤或正常纹状体中时,它们都能感染胶质瘤细胞且不感染神经元。然而,在脑室衬里的室管膜细胞中观察到病毒基因表达,这意味着这些痘病毒并不像最初预测的那样具有选择性。对于vvDD-IL15-Rα,一些荷瘤小鼠在病毒治疗后不久死亡。如果将相同滴度的vvDD-IL15-Rα直接注射到无瘤小鼠的侧脑室中,则会导致小鼠全部死亡。室管膜细胞、脑室下细胞和脑膜的感染很广泛。另一方面,vMyx-IL15Rα-tdTr仅短暂感染室管膜细胞,即使直接注射到侧脑室中也是安全的。这两种痘病毒在对树突状细胞的感染方面也有所不同;vvDD-IL15-Rα感染并裂解树突状细胞,但vMyx-IL15Rα-tdTr则不会。
痘苗病毒vvDD-IL15-Rα在治疗脑外癌症类型方面非常有前景。然而,对于位于脑内的癌症,黏液瘤病毒vMyx-IL15Rα-tdTr提供了一种更安全的选择。