Bao WenHan, Wang FangYu, Tang Wen
Department of Nephrology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Department of Nephrology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China,
Kidney Blood Press Res. 2019;44(1):123-132. doi: 10.1159/000498876. Epub 2019 Feb 22.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Possible predictive value of aortic-brachial arterial stiffness mismatch assessed by pulse wave velocity PWV ratio in peritoneal dialysis patients' outcomes need to be further elucidated. The aim of this study is to investigate the predictor value of PWV ratio on peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients' outcomes in China.
In this longitudinal cohort study, patients who started PD during September 20, 2005, to February 05, 2008, were included. All the patients were followed until January 31, 2018. Aortic-brachial arterial stiffness mismatch was assessed using carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity divided by carotid-radial pulse wave velocity (PWV ratio).
A total of 181 incident PD patients were included. The median survival of patients in PWV ratio above median group (4.03 years, 95% CI 4.64-7.99 years) was shorter than that of PWV ratio below median group (10.43 years, 95% CI 9.74-11.12 years, p< 0.001). The cardiovascular mortality rate in PWV ratio above median group were significantly higher than that of PWV below median group (log rank test, p< 0.001). Univariate Cox regression analysis showed that both PWV ratio (HR 2.42, 95% CI 1.80-3.25, p< 0.001) and CF-PWV (HR 1.27, 95% CI 1.16-1.38, p< 0.001) were associated with high patients' all-cause mortality. Multivariable Cox regression analysis showed that the PWV ratio was a strong and significantly predictor of cardiovascular mortality (HR 2.08 95% CI 1.16-3.71, p=0.014) after adjusting for coronary heart disease history (HR 2.39, 95% CI 1.20-4.76, p=0.013), diabetes mellitus history (HR 2.84, 95% CI 1.51-5.33, p=0.001). However, the CF-PWV was failed to be included as a significant predictor for both all-cause and CVD mortality in the multivariable Cox regression model.
Aortic-brachial arterial stiffness mismatch as assessed by PWV ratio, a new arteries stiffness risk parameter, is a significant prognostic indicator of CVD mortality in PD patients. We demonstrated that the discriminative power of the PWV ratio for both all-cause and CVD mortality was better than that CF-PWV.
背景/目的:通过脉搏波速度(PWV)比值评估的主动脉-肱动脉僵硬度不匹配对腹膜透析患者预后的潜在预测价值有待进一步阐明。本研究旨在探讨PWV比值对中国腹膜透析(PD)患者预后的预测价值。
在这项纵向队列研究中,纳入了2005年9月20日至2008年2月5日开始进行PD的患者。所有患者随访至2018年1月31日。使用颈股脉搏波速度除以颈桡脉搏波速度(PWV比值)来评估主动脉-肱动脉僵硬度不匹配。
共纳入181例新发PD患者。PWV比值高于中位数组患者的中位生存期(4.03年,95%CI 4.64-7.99年)短于PWV比值低于中位数组患者(10.43年,95%CI 9.74-11.12年,p<0.001)。PWV比值高于中位数组的心血管死亡率显著高于PWV低于中位数组(对数秩检验,p<0.001)。单因素Cox回归分析显示,PWV比值(HR 2.42,95%CI 1.80-3.25,p<0.001)和颈股脉搏波速度(CF-PWV,HR 1.27,95%CI 1.16-1.38,p<0.001)均与患者的全因死亡率相关。多因素Cox回归分析显示,在调整冠心病史(HR 2.39,95%CI 1.20-4.76,p=0.013)、糖尿病史(HR 2.84,95%CI 1.51-5.33,p=0.001)后,PWV比值是心血管死亡率的强有力且显著的预测指标(HR 2.08,95%CI 1.16-3.71,p=0.014)。然而,在多因素Cox回归模型中,CF-PWV未能作为全因死亡率和心血管疾病死亡率的显著预测指标纳入。
通过PWV比值评估的主动脉-肱动脉僵硬度不匹配作为一种新的动脉僵硬度风险参数,是PD患者心血管疾病死亡率的重要预后指标。我们证明,PWV比值对全因死亡率和心血管疾病死亡率的判别能力优于CF-PWV。