Choi Hye Young, Seo Mirinae, Sohn Yu-Mee, Hwang Ji Hye, Song Eun Jee, Min Sun Young, Kang Hye Jin, Han Dong Yoon
1 Department of Radiology, Kyung Hee University Hospital, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine , Seoul , South Korea.
2 Department of Medicine, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University , Seoul , South Korea.
Br J Radiol. 2019 May;92(1097):20180341. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20180341. Epub 2019 Mar 26.
We compared the diagnostic performance of B-mode ultrasound, shear wave elastography (SWE), and combined B-mode ultrasound and SWE in small breast lesions (≤ 2 cm), and evaluated the factors associated with false SWE results.
A total of 428 small breast lesions (≤ 2 cm) of 415 consecutive patients between August 2013 and February 2017 were included. The diagnostic performance of each set was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) analysis. Histologic diagnosis was used as reference standard. Multivariate logistic regression analyses identified the factors associated with false SWE results.
Of 428 lesions, 142 (33.2%) were malignant and 286 (66.8%) were benign. The AUC of the combined modality was higher than that of B-mode ultrasound (0.792 0.572, < 0.001) and that of SWE was higher than that of B-mode ultrasound (0.718 0.572, < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that the smaller lesion size and cancer were associated with false negative, and patient's age, high-risk lesion, shorter distance from the skin or chest wall, and deeper breast thickness were associated with false positive (all < 0.05).
The addition of SWE to B-mode ultrasound could improve the diagnostic performance in ≤ 2 cm lesions. However, ultrasound lesion size, pathology, and lesion location are likely to affect the SWE value and result in false results.
Despite the diagnostic usefulness of SWE in small breast lesions (≤ 2 cm), ultrasound lesion size, pathology, and lesion location were associated with false results.
我们比较了B超、剪切波弹性成像(SWE)以及B超联合SWE对小乳腺病变(≤2 cm)的诊断性能,并评估了与SWE假结果相关的因素。
纳入2013年8月至2017年2月期间415例连续患者的428个小乳腺病变(≤2 cm)。每组的诊断性能采用受试者操作特征曲线(AUC)下面积分析进行评估。组织学诊断用作参考标准。多因素逻辑回归分析确定与SWE假结果相关的因素。
428个病变中,142个(33.2%)为恶性,286个(66.8%)为良性。联合模式的AUC高于B超(0.792对0.572,P<0.001),SWE的AUC高于B超(0.718对0.572,P<0.001)。多因素分析显示,病变较小和癌症与假阴性相关,患者年龄、高危病变、距皮肤或胸壁距离较短以及乳腺较厚与假阳性相关(均P<0.05)。
B超联合SWE可提高对≤2 cm病变的诊断性能。然而,超声病变大小、病理及病变位置可能影响SWE值并导致假结果。
尽管SWE对小乳腺病变(≤2 cm)有诊断价值,但超声病变大小、病理及病变位置与假结果相关。