Department of Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Private Practice, Passau, Germany.
Int Endod J. 2019 Aug;52(8):1210-1217. doi: 10.1111/iej.13108. Epub 2019 Mar 27.
To compare penetration depths of endodontic irrigants into the dentinal tubules of extracted teeth when using several activation methods.
The root canals of 90 extracted human teeth were prepared to size 40, .06 taper. The straight and round-shaped root canals were distributed randomly into six groups, and final irrigation was performed with EDTA and sodium hypochlorite as follows: (I) manual dynamic activation, (II) Ultrasonic, (III) Sonic, (IV) PIPS (photon-induced photoacoustic streaming, (V) SWEEPS (shock-wave enhanced emission photoacoustic streaming) and (0) control without final irrigation or activation. Subsequently, methylene blue was inserted into the canals and activated according to the groups (I-V). Teeth were sectioned horizontally, imaged under a light microscope, and dye penetration depths were measured in six sections per tooth and 24 points on a virtual clock-face per section. Data were analysed statistically by nonparametric tests for whole teeth and separately for coronal, middle and apical thirds.
Penetration of dye into the dentinal tubules was lowest for the controls. Median penetration depths amounted to 700-900 μm for groups I-V with differences in the apical thirds between group I and the other test groups. Minimum penetration depths were significantly greater for PIPS in the apical thirds (P ≤ 0.046).
Greater penetration depths occurred in the apical thirds for ultrasonic, sonic and laser-induced activation compared to manual dynamic activation. PIPS was associated with deeper penetration of irrigants. The novel SWEEPS mode did not increase irrigant penetration.
比较几种激活方法下,根管冲洗剂在离体牙牙本质小管中的渗透深度。
将 90 颗离体人牙的根管预备至 40 号,0.06 锥度。直形和圆形根管随机分为六组,最后冲洗用 EDTA 和次氯酸钠进行,方法如下:(I)手动动态激活,(II)超声,(III)声,(IV)PIPS(光声空化流,(V)SWEEPS(冲击波增强发射光声空化流)和(0)无最终冲洗或激活的对照。随后,将亚甲蓝插入根管,并根据组(I-V)进行激活。牙齿水平切片,在光显微镜下成像,在每个牙齿的 6 个切片和每个切片的 24 个虚拟钟点上测量染料渗透深度。数据通过非参数检验进行统计分析,对整颗牙齿进行分析,并分别对冠部、中部和根尖部进行分析。
对照组染料渗透到牙本质小管中的深度最低。I-V 组的染料渗透深度中位数为 700-900 μm,根尖部 I 组与其他实验组之间存在差异。PIPS 在根尖部的最小渗透深度显著更大(P ≤ 0.046)。
与手动动态激活相比,超声、声和激光诱导激活在根尖部产生更大的渗透深度。PIPS 与冲洗剂的更深渗透有关。新型 SWEEPS 模式并未增加冲洗剂的渗透。