Iriarte Armando J, Ortiz Susana, Cubides-Flechas Katerine, Olaya Catalina, Jaimes-Monroy Gustavo
Universidad Antonio Nariño, Facultad de Odontología, Postgrado de Ortodoncia, Bogotá Colombia.
Universidad Antonio Nariño, Facultad de Odontología, Grupo Investigación en Salud Oral. Bogotá, Colombia.
Acta Odontol Latinoam. 2018 Dec;31(3):149-155.
The aim of this study was to use a 3-D finite element method (FEM) to compare the sliding resistance of 0.019"x0.025" stainless steel conventional archwires versus 0.019"x0.025" stainless steel beveled archwires in active (In-Ovation® Dentsply) and passive (SmartClip®, 3M) self-ligating brackets with 0.022" x 0.028" slots. A model was designed for each kind of bracket-archwire system and the following parameters were introduced in the models: friction coefficient calculated for stainless steel bracket-wire: 0.7 pm; Poisson ratio for stainless steel wire: 0.3, and elastic module: 205 GPa for bracket and 190 GPa for archwire. Static structural analysis was applied for homogeneous, linear and isotropic properties considering contacts between wire and bracket as frictional. The results indicate that the beveled archwire generates less stress than the rectangular wire in SmartClip® and In-Ovation® brackets. Comparing brackets, SmartClip® generated less stress than InOvation®. It is concluded that beveled rectangular arch wires provide the advantage of reduced sliding resistance, which is better in some clinical situations to improve orthodontic mechanics.
本研究的目的是使用三维有限元方法(FEM),比较0.019英寸×0.025英寸的不锈钢传统弓丝与0.019英寸×0.025英寸的不锈钢斜切弓丝在具有0.022英寸×0.028英寸槽沟的主动式(登士柏公司的In - Ovation®)和被动式(3M公司的SmartClip®)自锁托槽中的滑动阻力。针对每种托槽 - 弓丝系统设计了一个模型,并在模型中引入以下参数:不锈钢托槽 - 弓丝的摩擦系数计算值:0.7μm;不锈钢弓丝的泊松比:0.3,弹性模量:托槽为205GPa,弓丝为190GPa。考虑到弓丝与托槽之间的接触为摩擦接触,对均匀、线性和各向同性特性应用了静态结构分析。结果表明,在SmartClip®和In - Ovation®托槽中,斜切弓丝产生的应力比矩形弓丝小。比较托槽,SmartClip®产生的应力比In - Ovation®小。得出的结论是,斜切矩形弓丝具有降低滑动阻力的优势,在某些临床情况下,这对于改善正畸力学效果更好。