Department of Epidemiology, German Institute of Human Nutrition Potsdam-Rehbruecke (DIfE), Arthur-Scheunert-Allee 114-116, 14558, Nuthetal, Germany.
NutriAct - Competence Cluster Nutrition Research, Berlin-Potsdam, Germany.
Nutr J. 2019 Mar 7;18(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s12937-019-0440-8.
Meals differ in their nutritional content. This variation has not been fully addressed despite its potential contribution in understanding eating behavior. The aim of this study was to investigate the between-meal and between-individual variance in energy and macronutrient intake as a measure of variation in intake and the meal type-specific relative importance of predictors of these intake variations.
Energy and macronutrient intake were derived from three 24 h dietary recalls in an EPIC-Potsdam sub-cohort of 814 German adults. Intra-class correlation was calculated for participants and meal type. Predictors of intake were assessed using meal type-specific multilevel regression models in a structural equation modeling framework at intake and participant levels using the Pratt Index. The importance of the predictor energy misreporting was assessed in sensitivity analyses on 682 participants. 95% confidence intervals were calculated based on 1000 bootstrap samples.
Differences between meal types explain a large proportion of the variation in intake (intra-class correlation: 39% for energy, 25% for carbohydrates, 47% for protein, and 33% for fat). Between-participant variation in intake was much lower, with a maximum of 3% for carbohydrate and fat. Place of meal was the most important intake-level predictor of energy and macronutrient intake (Pratt Index of up to 65%). Week/weekend day was important in the breakfast meal, and prior interval (hours passed since last meal) was important for the afternoon snack and dinner. On the participant level, sex was the most important predictor, with Pratt Index of up to 95 and 59% in the main and in the sensitivity analysis, respectively. Energy misreporting was especially important at the afternoon snack, accounting for up to 69% of the explained variance.
The meal type explains the highest variation in energy and macronutrient intakes. We identified key predictors of variation in the intake and in the participant levels. These findings suggest that successful dietary modification efforts should focus on improving specific meals.
膳食在其营养成分上存在差异。尽管这种差异可能有助于理解饮食行为,但它尚未得到充分解决。本研究旨在调查餐间和个体间能量和宏量营养素摄入的差异,以此作为衡量摄入变化的指标,并研究这些摄入变化的预测因素在各餐类型中的相对重要性。
在 EPIC-Potsdam 子队列的 814 名德国成年人中,通过 3 次 24 小时膳食回忆获得能量和宏量营养素的摄入量。计算参与者和膳食类型的组内相关系数。使用结构方程模型框架中的膳食类型特异性多层回归模型,在摄入量和参与者水平上,使用 Pratt 指数评估摄入的预测因素。在对 682 名参与者进行的敏感性分析中,评估了预测因素能量错误报告的重要性。置信区间基于 1000 次 bootstrap 样本计算。
膳食类型之间的差异解释了摄入变化的很大一部分(组内相关系数:能量为 39%,碳水化合物为 25%,蛋白质为 47%,脂肪为 33%)。个体间的摄入变化要小得多,碳水化合物和脂肪的最大值为 3%。膳食地点是能量和宏量营养素摄入的最重要摄入水平预测因素(Pratt 指数高达 65%)。周/周末是早餐的重要影响因素,前一间隔(上次进餐后经过的小时数)对下午零食和晚餐很重要。在参与者水平上,性别是最重要的预测因素,主要分析中的 Pratt 指数高达 95%,敏感性分析中的 Pratt 指数高达 59%。能量错误报告在下午零食中尤为重要,占解释方差的 69%。
膳食类型解释了能量和宏量营养素摄入变化的最大差异。我们确定了摄入和参与者水平变化的关键预测因素。这些发现表明,成功的饮食干预措施应侧重于改善特定的膳食。