Suppr超能文献

患者权利与伦理

Patient Rights and Ethics

作者信息

Olejarczyk Jacob P., Young Michael

机构信息

Marian University

Abstract

"Rights aren't rights if someone can take them away. They're privileges." (Carlin C. . Eardrum Records; 2008). Minimum enforceable standards for the ways persons can expect to be treated by others are human rights. Customary standards for the ways persons in a given society are expected to treat others are ethics. As such, every patient right is derived from 1 or more medical or social ethical principles. See StatPearls' companion reference, "Medical Ethics," for more information. The concept of healthcare quality contains 2 primary facets as follows: 1. Providing a service that meets the expectations of the primary customer/stakeholder (the patient) in the service transaction                       . 2. Standardizing the service so that the same level of service is provided across patients  . Since each patient/customer has different preferences and all services have associated costs (related to time and equipment), individuals establishing rights must balance the costs with an objective quality level that can be maintained across all patients/customers across different healthcare fields and facilities. Furthermore, nearly all rights have associated responsibilities. Legislators hesitate to establish and protect rights unless they believe people can act in a way that shows responsibility or has 'earned' them.   Healthcare in the United States is unique among developed countries as follows: It is by far the most expensive per national capita (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development; 2023. https://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=SHA. Accessed Apri 4, 2024).                     . Most types of services are not granted as a right irrelevant of cost.                                                               . There is no single location where Americans can find a list of their healthcare rights. In response to the last point, various American healthcare organizations (HCOs) have created their own non-enforceable healthcare bills of rights. This process began in the 1970s with the American Cancer Society and American Hospital Association. The American Cancer Society published the opinion that bills of patient rights "empower people to take an active role in improving their health... strengthen the relationships people have with their health care providers... [and help patients] in dealing with insurance companies and other specific situations related to health coverage" (American Cancer Society. 2019. . https://qa.cancer.org/content/dam/CRC/PDF/Public/6706.00.pdf. Accessed April 17, 2024). The American Medical Association (AMA) is the largest American physician organization (although only about 15% of American physicians belong)  and keeps the longest-standing ethics code of any healthcare professional (HCP) organization in the world. For the first time in 2017, it created a list of patient rights (https://code-medical-ethics.ama-assn.org/ethics-opinions/patient-rights. Accessed April 17, 2024). Prevailing American political and philosophical perspectives generally use language that preserves individual preferences while avoiding promises that would allow such preferences to harm others or prevent the government from protecting society. In other words, the function of rights in any 1 society is to find a middle ground between the wellness of individuals with the wellness of the collective society. A recent example of this includes measures that government administrators took to restrict the spread of the SARS-CoV-2 virus (COVID-19), such as the use of vaccines, tissue testing, respiratory tract masking, and barring of entry to public places by unvaccinated and unmasked persons. Commonly developed patient rights derive from a limited set of ethical principles guiding patient treatment. These include the following: Placing a high value on the patient's dignity as a person                                                                                  . Acting with goodwill toward the patient, in particular, seeking to preserve the patient's life and autonomy             . Avoiding actions or inactions known to expose the patient to potential harm                                                        . Distributing resources equitably across patients. HCPS need to know how to prioritize ethical principles because usually, an enforceable standard for how to prioritize principles (eg, based on positions of a government vs a national healthcare society, local institution, or religious organization) does not exist. This article reviews some historical precedents for prioritizing the principles. See StatPearls' companion reference, "Medical Ethics," for more information.

摘要

“如果有人能剥夺权利,那它们就不是权利,而是特权。”(卡林·C. 《鼓膜唱片》;2008年)。人们期望他人对待自己的方式的最低可执行标准就是人权。特定社会中人们期望彼此对待方式的习惯标准就是伦理。因此,每项患者权利都源自一项或多项医学或社会伦理原则。更多信息请参阅StatPearls的配套参考文献《医学伦理学》。医疗质量的概念包含以下两个主要方面:1. 提供一项能满足服务交易中主要客户/利益相关者(患者)期望的服务。2. 对服务进行标准化,以便为所有患者提供相同水平的服务。由于每个患者/客户都有不同的偏好,且所有服务都有相关成本(与时间和设备有关),确立权利的个人必须在成本与客观质量水平之间进行权衡,这种质量水平要能在不同医疗领域和设施的所有患者/客户中保持一致。此外,几乎所有权利都有相关的责任。立法者在人们无法以负责任的方式行事或没有“赢得”权利之前,会犹豫是否要确立并保护这些权利。美国的医疗保健在发达国家中具有以下独特之处:它是人均成本最高的(经济合作与发展组织;2023年。https://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=SHA。2024年4月4日访问)。大多数类型的服务不会被视为与成本无关的权利。美国人无法在单一地点找到他们的医疗保健权利清单。针对最后一点,美国各种医疗保健组织(HCOs)制定了各自不可执行的医疗保健权利法案。这一过程始于20世纪70年代的美国癌症协会和美国医院协会。美国癌症协会发表意见称,患者权利法案“使人们能够在改善自身健康方面发挥积极作用……加强人们与医疗保健提供者的关系……[并帮助患者]应对保险公司和其他与医保覆盖相关的特定情况”(美国癌症协会。2019年。https://qa.cancer.org/content/dam/CRC/PDF/Public/6706.00.pdf。2024年4月17日访问)。美国医学协会(AMA)是美国最大的医师组织(尽管只有约15%的美国医师属于该组织),并且拥有世界上任何医疗保健专业人员(HCP)组织中最悠久的道德准则。2017年,它首次制定了一份患者权利清单(https://code-medical-ethics.ama-assn.org/ethics-opinions/patient-rights。2024年4月17日访问)。美国普遍的政治和哲学观点通常使用这样的语言:既维护个人偏好,又避免做出可能让这些偏好伤害他人或阻碍政府保护社会的承诺。换句话说,任何一个社会中权利的作用是在个人福祉与集体社会福祉之间找到一个平衡点。最近的一个例子包括政府管理人员为限制SARS-CoV-2病毒(新冠病毒)传播所采取的措施,如使用疫苗、组织检测、呼吸道戴口罩以及禁止未接种疫苗和未戴口罩的人进入公共场所。常见的患者权利源自指导患者治疗的一组有限的伦理原则。这些原则包括:高度重视患者作为人的尊严。善意对待患者,尤其要努力维护患者的生命和自主权。避免采取已知会使患者面临潜在伤害的行为或不作为。在患者之间公平分配资源。医疗保健专业人员需要知道如何对伦理原则进行优先级排序,因为通常不存在关于如何对原则进行优先级排序的可执行标准(例如,基于政府与国家医疗保健协会、当地机构或宗教组织的立场)。本文回顾了一些对这些原则进行优先级排序的历史先例。更多信息请参阅StatPearls的配套参考文献《医学伦理学》。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验