Suppr超能文献

集群性头痛:耳科医生和神经科医生的交叉点——蝶腭神经节治疗及系统评价。

Cluster headache: crosspoint between otologists and neurologists-treatment of the sphenopalatine ganglion and systematic review.

机构信息

Otorhinolaryngology Unit, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, University of Milan, via A. di Rudinì 8, 20142, Milan, Italy.

Otorhinolaryngology Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of Milan, via A. di Rudinì 8, 20142, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Neurol Sci. 2019 May;40(Suppl 1):137-146. doi: 10.1007/s10072-019-03796-5.

Abstract

Among cephalgias, cluster headache (CH) is the rarest and the most disabling, explaining the appellation of "suicide headache." Up to 20% of chronic CH reveals to be resistant to pharmacological treatments, in which case interventional procedures should be considered. Many reports evaluated invasive approaches and a wide strand of research is dedicated to the sphenopalatine ganglion. Our paper will now be focused on providing an overview on modern applications on the sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG), their outcomes, and their feasibility in terms of risks and benefits. The group reviewed the international literature systematically for procedures targeting the sphenopalatine ganglion and its branches for episodic and chronic CH, including block, stimulation, radiofrequency, stereotactic radiosurgery, and vidian neurectomy. Seventeen articles fixed our inclusion criteria. Comparing the outcomes that have been analyzed, it is possible to notice how the most successful procedure for the treatment of refractory chronic and episodic CH is the SPG block, which reaches respectively 76.5% and 87% of efficacy. Radiofrequency has a wide range of outcomes, from 33 to 70.3% in CCH. Stimulation of SPG only achieved up to 55% of outcomes in significant reduction in attack frequency in CCH and 71% in ECH. Radiosurgery and vidian neurectomy on SPG have also been analyzed. Generally, ECH patients show better response to standard medical therapies; nevertheless, even this more manageable condition may sometimes benefit from interventional therapies mostly reserved for CCH. First results seem promising and considering the low frequency of side effects or complications, we should think of expanding the indications of the procedures also to those conditions. Outcomes certainly suggest that further studies are necessary in order to understand which method is the most effective and with less side effects. Placebo-controlled studies would be pivotal, and tight collaboration between neurologists and otorhinolaryngologists should also be central in order to give correct indications, which allow us to expect procedures on the SPG to be an effective and mostly safe method to control either refractory ECH or CCH.

摘要

在头痛中,丛集性头痛(CH)是最罕见和最致残的,因此被称为“自杀性头痛”。高达 20%的慢性 CH 对药物治疗有抗性,在这种情况下,应考虑介入性治疗。许多报告评估了侵入性方法,并且广泛的研究致力于研究蝶腭神经节。我们的论文现在将集中于提供关于蝶腭神经节(SPG)的现代应用、其结果以及在风险和收益方面的可行性的概述。该小组系统地审查了针对蝶腭神经节及其分支的治疗阵发性和慢性 CH 的国际文献,包括阻滞、刺激、射频、立体定向放射外科和翼管神经切除术。有 17 篇文章符合我们的纳入标准。比较分析的结果,可以注意到治疗难治性慢性和阵发性 CH 最成功的方法是 SPG 阻滞,其疗效分别为 76.5%和 87%。射频的疗效范围从 33%到 70.3%,在慢性丛集性头痛中。SPG 刺激仅在慢性丛集性头痛中显著减少发作频率方面达到 55%,在阵发性丛集性头痛中达到 71%。SPG 的放射外科和翼管神经切除术也得到了分析。一般来说,阵发性 CH 患者对标准药物治疗的反应更好;然而,即使是这种更容易控制的情况,有时也可能受益于主要保留用于慢性丛集性头痛的介入治疗。初步结果似乎很有希望,考虑到副作用或并发症的低频率,我们应该考虑将这些程序的适应证扩展到这些情况。结果确实表明,需要进一步研究,以了解哪种方法最有效且副作用最小。安慰剂对照研究将是关键,神经病学家和耳鼻喉科医生之间的紧密合作也应该是核心,以便给出正确的适应证,这使我们期望 SPG 上的手术成为控制难治性阵发性 CH 或慢性 CH 的有效且主要安全的方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验